well then of course it's going to be slower if anti aliasing is only working in 1 of them
RC1 Review
|
03-10-2010, 06:55 AM
(This post was last modified: 03-10-2010, 06:56 AM by Starscream.)
Yes, that is what I meant, that does help explain some of the slowdown. The settings were exactly the same for both revisions, as I said, I just forgot that Anti-aliasing was working again. Either way, there is still some difference in speeds. I'll post more shots later on.
Asus Laptop: K53TA
OS: Windows 7 Home Premium, 64-Bit - SP1 CPU: AMD Llano A6-3400M, Quad-Core, 1.4GHz-2.6GHz (Overclocked) GPU: AMD Radeon HD6650M, 1GB GDDR3 (Catalyst 13.1) RAM: Samsung 4GB DDR3-1333 03-10-2010, 08:29 AM
yea but the increases compatibility kinda makes up fr the small difference if you ask me
03-10-2010, 09:05 AM
I read about this on the home page a few minutes ago. How good is this compared to the builds from spellforce and mario like 5170, etc?
03-10-2010, 09:40 AM
03-10-2010, 09:44 AM
Same results even with AA off.
So, what does all this mean? I'm not saying the devs are doing a bad job, what I'm saying is that speed has decreased over time. I'm just providing some feedback about the facts.
Asus Laptop: K53TA
OS: Windows 7 Home Premium, 64-Bit - SP1 CPU: AMD Llano A6-3400M, Quad-Core, 1.4GHz-2.6GHz (Overclocked) GPU: AMD Radeon HD6650M, 1GB GDDR3 (Catalyst 13.1) RAM: Samsung 4GB DDR3-1333
Test one by one the revisions to try and figure where it slows down for you.
Test 5000 or 5115 03-10-2010, 09:49 AM
I compared r4869 with Orleans r5170 with sse3 and got exactly same frame rates, but... I didnt test the same games as you did.
03-10-2010, 09:56 AM
@ GodRays: That's going to take some time and I'm not sure if I'm willing to dedicate that much time right now.
@ John: If you do compare some more, let me know if you're using the same type of setup as I am or not. Like a 64-Bit OS and Windows 7. It does matter in the testing. My specs are in my sig for the Laptop.
Asus Laptop: K53TA
OS: Windows 7 Home Premium, 64-Bit - SP1 CPU: AMD Llano A6-3400M, Quad-Core, 1.4GHz-2.6GHz (Overclocked) GPU: AMD Radeon HD6650M, 1GB GDDR3 (Catalyst 13.1) RAM: Samsung 4GB DDR3-1333
I would like to add a few comparative shots to this thread i can agree that globally 2.0-RC1 is slower in most cases but it seems that all games i tested run better on some revisions and worse on others,
so far the best revision that worked for 85% of my games is R4977 with 95% of the time full speeds. anything above R5000 is slower and slower for me so i stick with R4977 for now. I also must add that the revisions post R5000 are very Jumpy in fps, in the same scene where i get 50 fps stable on R4977, it jumps around between 40 to 50 fps on the other revisions with no particular reason. (PS: i made a zip file because the forum w'ont let me add more than 5 attachments if you want to see the other screenshots DL the Zip) Dolphin Comparative Shots.zip I just want to add that The Same exact settings were used on all revisions.
Intel C2D E8400@[color=#FF0000]3.8[/color]ghz, 6gb KingstonHyperX DDR2 1066mhz, ATI HD5830 1Gb, Windows 7 x64
My Youtube Channel: Dedicated to Anime, Gaming and Emulation. |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)