Actually, communism was never going to be what it said it was. In traditional philosophy, there is a single form of logic. Everyone can have their own way to find the truth, but the truth is the truth so if you follow the truth you come to the same conclusions when given the same information. Karl Marx believed otherwise. Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels wrote that there were two kinds of logic, bourgeoisie logic and proletariat logic. If you lived in luxury and controlled working people, you would have bourgeoisie logic, and would become selfish and evil, more or less. If you were a working man, you'd possess proletariat logic, and you'd eventually follow communism in overthrowing the bourgeoisie and then live in a society of perfection and complete selflessness.
But Karl Marx lived a life of luxury provided by a wealthy industrialist: Friedrich Engels. Engels was filthy rich, inheriting his father's cotton empire. All throughout his life, he never became a working man, he maintain the cotton empire his father built and was tremendously wealthy, and used those funds to provide Karl Marx his own estate with servants and fresh fruit and all the luxuries of the time. Basically, Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, the writers of the Communist Manifesto, were rich and powerful: bourgeoisie.
If Communism was a real belief system, how is that possible? How can someone with bourgeoisie logic write about the struggle of the proletariat, when the very manifesto states that bourgeoisie should be hunted down and killed because they possess selfish and corrupted ways of thinking? It isn't; Communism was never pure, and what happened to Russia is exactly what Communism was for. It is a means to obtain power.
But Karl Marx lived a life of luxury provided by a wealthy industrialist: Friedrich Engels. Engels was filthy rich, inheriting his father's cotton empire. All throughout his life, he never became a working man, he maintain the cotton empire his father built and was tremendously wealthy, and used those funds to provide Karl Marx his own estate with servants and fresh fruit and all the luxuries of the time. Basically, Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, the writers of the Communist Manifesto, were rich and powerful: bourgeoisie.
If Communism was a real belief system, how is that possible? How can someone with bourgeoisie logic write about the struggle of the proletariat, when the very manifesto states that bourgeoisie should be hunted down and killed because they possess selfish and corrupted ways of thinking? It isn't; Communism was never pure, and what happened to Russia is exactly what Communism was for. It is a means to obtain power.
Intel Xeon w7-3465X OC | Asus Pro WS W790-E Sage SE | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 FE | 8x16GiB G-Skill Zeta R5 DDR5-6000 | Windows 11 23H2 | (details)
MacBook Pro 14in | M1 Max (32 GPU Cores) | 64GB LPDDR5 6400 | macOS 13