![]() |
|
What happened with my friend's labtop ? - Printable Version +- Dolphin, the GameCube and Wii emulator - Forums (https://forums.dolphin-emu.org) +-- Forum: Dolphin Emulator Discussion and Support (https://forums.dolphin-emu.org/Forum-dolphin-emulator-discussion-and-support) +--- Forum: Support (https://forums.dolphin-emu.org/Forum-support) +--- Thread: What happened with my friend's labtop ? (/Thread-what-happened-with-my-friend-s-labtop) Pages:
1
2
|
What happened with my friend's labtop ? - winnejiro - 04-11-2009 Hello everybody! I really wonder with my computer and my friend's labtop for several day. Why the results is reverse !?!. There're my tested computers: My friend's labtop CPU: AMD Turion 64 X2 @ 2,100 GHz RAM: 3,078 MB Video: GeForce 8400 G with 512 MB Mainboard: Acer Aspire 5520 G Hard Disk: SATA-II with 250 GB Operating System : Microsoft Windows XP x64 Edition My current computer CPU: Intel Pentium Dual-Core E2140 @ 1,600 MHz RAM: 1,024 MB Video Card: Inno 3D NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT with 512 MB Mainboard: EGS P4M990T-M2 Hard Disk: SATA with 160 GB Operating System : Microsoft Windows XP x64 Edition The both computer are healthy. The both computer are run Dolphin-Emu X64 in the normally and use same settings to emulate HARVEST MOON - MAGICAL MELODY. These are the settings: Enable Dual Core = YES Enable Idle Skipping = YES Enable Cheats = NO HLE the BIOS all the time = YES Enable JIT dynarec = YES Lock theards to core = YES Optimize Queantizer = YES OpenGL Graphic Plug-in Fullscreen = NO VSync (req. restart) = NO Render to main window = NO Auto scale (try to remove borders) = YES Native resolution = YES Use real XFB = NO Keep 4:3 aspect ratio = NO Fullscreen video mode = 640x480 Windowed video mode = 640x480 Anisotropic filter = 4x Antialias (MSAA) = OFF Force bi/trilinear filtering = NO And I'm do nothing with other settings. Results My current computer Framerate: 25.86 - 35.48 FPS Emulation error(s): NOT FOUND Graphin emulation quality: EXCELLENT Sound emulation quality: EXCELLENT My friend's labtop Framerate: 10.35 - 26.72 FPS Emulation error(s): AT MAIN MENU AND IN GAME Graphin emulation quality: AVERAGE Sound emulation quality: NOT SO GOOD When start the processing-racing, In the end my Intel Pentium Dual-Core is the winner !?! (My results are look like had many perfidious !!) In the really, I don't even thinking about cheats, using different programs and even overclock my computer. He should be the winner because he has got greater computer then me for X3.5-X4 . I'm should be the losser in the really. So! Please tell me , What happened with my friend's labtop ? And the last, Thank you very much for read and ask my question everybody .And I'll really conscience if I making someone have got bad feeling from me .
RE: What happened with my friend's labtop ? - cmccmc - 04-11-2009 Are either of you running any greedy programs. RE: What happened with my friend's labtop ? - Glurion - 04-11-2009 Your friends probably got alot of power hungry programs running in the background, you should open task manager (CTRL+ALT+Del) and check to see how many processes each computer is running during idle. RE: What happened with my friend's labtop ? - cmccmc - 04-11-2009 thats what I just said. RE: What happened with my friend's labtop ? - Glurion - 04-11-2009 yes i know but i expanded by saying he should compare the two, i wouldn't have repeated the same information if i wasnt adding something
RE: What happened with my friend's labtop ? - winnejiro - 04-12-2009 Hello cmccmc and Glurion! I'll try to do follow your advise. Now trying..................... OK Well!, I've saw all processes on both computer. In the both computer are have processes, CPU Usage and Memory Usage are nearby balanced before start emulate the game. And OH! NO!, I've saw, My friend's labtop is has unsteady processing clock are: 1,970 MHz @ second 1 1,456 MHz @ second 2 2,162 MHz @ second 3 1,653 MHz @ second 4 1,584 MHz @ second 5 2,083 MHz @ second 6 1,678 MHz @ second 7 2,012 MHz @ second 8 2,094 MHz @ second 9 And 1,245 MHz @ second 10 But my computer processing clock are: 1,119 MHz @ second 1 1,596 MHz @ second 2 1,596 MHz @ second 3 1,596 MHz @ second 4 1,596 MHz @ second 5 1,596 MHz @ second 6 1,596 MHz @ second 7 1,596 MHz @ second 8 1,119 MHz @ second 9 And 1,596 MHz @ second 10 These results are come from CPU-Z and both computer are normally processing. So! I've got one more question to tell you is: Why the my friend's labtop hasn't steady processing clock ? And the last, Thank you very much again for your technique both .
RE: What happened with my friend's labtop ? - cmccmc - 04-12-2009 I'm sorry but I don't have a clue.
RE: What happened with my friend's labtop ? - Glurion - 04-12-2009 hmm has your friend overclocked his/her cpu? it might be the quartz oscillator on the system board is faulty and can't keep a set frequency anymore. The quartz oscillator is the component on the system board which controls the clock speed of a CPU. The higher the frequency of the oscillator, the faster the oscillator moves back and forth, which means the CPU will be faster (e.g. a 1.6GHz CPU is slower than 2.6GHz CPU). EDIt: i see your friend has an AMD i have no experience in these but i'm sure they work on the same principle as Intel just a different socket and design. RE: What happened with my friend's labtop ? - zephyr8965 - 04-12-2009 Perhaps it's driver software? Have you and your friend both updated all the drivers on your computer as best you can? Also, AMD has an optimization thing for dual core processors to help the information traveling between the two cores, or something like that. I've noticed a minor improvement in my computer's performance since getting it, so you might have your friend get that if they haven't, already. I doubt these things will completely close the gap in speeds between the computers, but might help a little. Also, updating direct x to the march release if you haven't already should help, as well. RE: What happened with my friend's labtop ? - naroth - 04-12-2009 Tell your friend to get an intel processor, they are WAY better than AMD |