![]() |
|
Nvidias 336 Processor Cores vs ATIs 1120 Stream Processing Units - which is better? - Printable Version +- Dolphin, the GameCube and Wii emulator - Forums (https://forums.dolphin-emu.org) +-- Forum: Dolphin Emulator Discussion and Support (https://forums.dolphin-emu.org/Forum-dolphin-emulator-discussion-and-support) +--- Forum: Support (https://forums.dolphin-emu.org/Forum-support) +--- Thread: Nvidias 336 Processor Cores vs ATIs 1120 Stream Processing Units - which is better? (/Thread-nvidias-336-processor-cores-vs-atis-1120-stream-processing-units-which-is-better) Pages:
1
2
|
Nvidias 336 Processor Cores vs ATIs 1120 Stream Processing Units - which is better? - hypnotoad - 01-20-2011 I'm comparing ATI and Nvidia in the same price range, about $170, and with certain specs that are the same: Memory Size: 1GB Memory Interface: 256-bit Memory Type: DDR5 The major difference I see, is the number of processor cores / stream processing units. These must not be the same thing. If so, ATI has over 3 times as many, and that's what everyone should buy. nVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 Core Clock: 725MHz Stream Processors: 336 Processor Cores Effective Memory Clock: 3600MHz ATI Radeon HD 5830 (for instance) Core Clock: 800MHz Stream Processors: 1120 Stream Processing Units Effective Memory Clock: 1000MHz (4.0Gbps) Another major difference, is the "Effective Memory Clock", 3600MHz to 1000MHz. Interesting claim, here. And they also compared the GTX 460 with the Radeon HD 5830. http://www.nvidia.com/object/product-geforce-gtx-460-us.html It says at the bottom of the page: nVIDIA Wrote:GeForce GTX 460 has 4 times faster FPS versus Radeon HD 5830 in Microsoft DirectX 11 SDK subd11 tessellation test with maximum tessellation level set. RE: Nvidias 336 Processor Cores vs ATIs 1120 Stream Processing Units - which is better? - Squall Leonhart - 01-20-2011 the 460 has more REAL cores, the 5830 only has 224 which distribute for 4ops and 1 sop every cycle, however to reach peak performance on amd, the drivers usually have to be specially optimised for the app due to the 4+1way design. average is 2+1 every cycle which leaves a good amount of shaders practically useless. RE: Nvidias 336 Processor Cores vs ATIs 1120 Stream Processing Units - which is better? - abfab126 - 01-20-2011 460 WINS , I think , in any cases ... RE: Nvidias 336 Processor Cores vs ATIs 1120 Stream Processing Units - which is better? - dannzen - 01-21-2011 fanboy? http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/geforce-gtx-460-gf104-fermi,2684-6.html conclusion: both are more than enough to handle dolphin... (01-20-2011, 06:14 PM)hypnotoad Wrote: http://www.nvidia.com/object/product-geforce-gtx-460-us.html jeah but still under playable speed its marketing bullshitbut I would prefer nvidia... its overall better RE: Nvidias 336 Processor Cores vs ATIs 1120 Stream Processing Units - which is better? - sixor - 01-21-2011 lol ati and nvidia have different ways to do the same thing, so you can't compare one brand vs another just by the spec but in the end gtx460>5830 and 6850>both RE: Nvidias 336 Processor Cores vs ATIs 1120 Stream Processing Units - which is better? - abfab126 - 01-21-2011 Indeed , but I ll say even sometimes 460 > OR = 6850 ^^ RE: Nvidias 336 Processor Cores vs ATIs 1120 Stream Processing Units - which is better? - meforero - 01-21-2011 (01-21-2011, 03:23 AM)abfab126 Wrote: Indeed , but I ll say even sometimes 460 > OR = 6850 ^^ I was a fanatic of nvidia... but some day i play on may laptop (with ati) and i dicovery that my laptop are most power that desktop with nvidia. change my desktop now i have ati 4870 ddr3 and by the same price compare with nvidia i have ddr3 and more gigaflops... mmm dolphin allmost game run at 60fps. The real gamers only has ATI CIAO RE: Nvidias 336 Processor Cores vs ATIs 1120 Stream Processing Units - which is better? - cristiano_ronaldo - 01-21-2011 n vidia forever RE: Nvidias 336 Processor Cores vs ATIs 1120 Stream Processing Units - which is better? - NaturalViolence - 01-21-2011 I can't believe this was a serious question. Any benchmark that can be looked up on google in 5 seconds shows the GTX460 raping a 5830 across the board. It's at least 25-30% faster on average. But then again a 460 is supposed to be more expensive ($160 for a 5830, $170-200 for a 460 depending on if it's the 1GB edition or regular). Not sure where those prices in the OP came from. RE: Nvidias 336 Processor Cores vs ATIs 1120 Stream Processing Units - which is better? - dannzen - 01-21-2011 dont forget the power consumption in full and idle + loadness of nvidia cards... these 3 factors helped me by my decision.... i have a ati 5770 in my rig the airplane loadness of a nvidia sucks... and iam using my i7 rig undervolted as workstation... |