06-08-2010, 02:11 AM
06-08-2010, 02:12 AM
(06-08-2010, 02:11 AM)Arpit Wrote: [ -> ]DO YOU HAVE YOUR WINDOWS INSTALLED ON FLASH DRIVE???no but you can if thats what you want
probably not...
even on a not-SSD flash memory its possible
06-08-2010, 02:16 AM
I want to say that nobody uses pen drive for a million write...
Even Readyboost enabled pendrive would last minimum for 10 straight years..
Even Readyboost enabled pendrive would last minimum for 10 straight years..
06-08-2010, 03:19 AM
(06-08-2010, 02:16 AM)Arpit Wrote: [ -> ]I want to say that nobody uses flash drive for a million write...wrong.
many ppl who own a SSD use it for the OS (obviously cause that makes the OS alot faster). and the OS writes alot

and i said a few million (if not billion) writes breaks flash memory
06-08-2010, 03:30 AM
CORRECTED....PEN DRIVE:p
06-08-2010, 09:30 PM
(06-08-2010, 03:19 AM)Daco Wrote: [ -> ](06-08-2010, 02:16 AM)Arpit Wrote: [ -> ]I want to say that nobody uses flash drive for a million write...wrong.
many ppl who own a SSD use it for the OS (obviously cause that makes the OS alot faster). and the OS writes alot
and i said a few million (if not billion) writes breaks flash memory
True. But I thought external flash pen drives can't withstand the amount of writes an OS like windows xp/vista/7 make, and it would wear out rather fast.
SATA SSD's and other solid state memory designed for normal every day use is of course different.
A standard 16gb thumb pen drive, has very slow read access times and data transfer speeds, and the flash memory is of lower quality than say intel's x25 ssd drive. I found it to be a quite useless way to install cheap flash memory bootable drive for ubuntu and redhat, because the usb interface itself is such a bottleneck.
06-09-2010, 03:22 AM
yeah....Pen Drive is only for Pocket Portable Data, and is smaller and safer than those DVD's and its rewritable:p
SSD are quite durable and faster, at the cost of price and memory limitations at this point of stage....
SSD are quite durable and faster, at the cost of price and memory limitations at this point of stage....
06-09-2010, 04:16 AM
(05-30-2010, 04:26 AM)Daco Wrote: [ -> ](05-30-2010, 04:22 AM)Ocean Wrote: [ -> ](05-30-2010, 12:16 AM)Daco Wrote: [ -> ]wait
why get 24 SSD's in raid?
thats overkill , let alone useless
They didn't, it makes no sense for consumer use. They got the drives for demonstration from Samsung for a day.
let me rephrase
why put 24 SSD's in raid?
its overkill
even for a demonstration its overkill
It is if the motherboard is not using SATA 6g/s ^^
06-09-2010, 02:35 PM
Quote:It is if the motherboard is not using SATA 6g/s ^^
Maybe they should use SSD on ENIAC....That should push SSD's to the limits....:p
LuisR14
06-10-2010, 06:28 PM
lol, had seen this video at my tech school :p