(03-03-2012, 08:10 AM)bjakja Wrote: [ -> ][quote=kAs1m]could you compile last ICC revision with FIFO patch?[/qoute]
Newest Revision 433 have working fifo patch inside, I tested The Last Story for 5 hours and it works for sure. Could you compile ICC revision of it? Regular is still too slow even using dx11.
The latest revision on the master branch is 3.0-432-gee09def
(ee09def802f9883056a2dc43136e65922dcccee2). Which revision
(please provide SHA-1 or short hash) would you like compiled?
current 3.0-433 revisions:
3.0-433-g8cdd90f (8cdd90fc6276db897e895704ed69ee60f7a7e3df)
3.0-433-g9e398fd (9e398fd418027e4932a1539f7d382b70e8acc408)
3.0-433-g9276b76 (9276b76fbc0ac77bad5f15ba3d8038c53943249e)
bjakja is referring to the fifo patch in the FifoBusy branch. Should compile the latest in that branch as it contains some bug fixes to the original commit.
(03-03-2012, 03:44 PM)skid Wrote: [ -> ]bjakja is referring to the fifo patch in the FifoBusy branch. Should compile the latest in that branch as it contains some bug fixes to the original commit.
Ah, thanks for the clarification.
Unless for some reason that's not what Bjakja wants, I'll
get started on compiling it. It will be up sometime tomorrow.
Thanks Lectrode, I don't even know that is there 3 different revisions 433.
(03-03-2012, 05:41 AM)Lectrode Wrote: [ -> ]I would definitely let the devs know about that. You might also try
some of the older revisions to see if that problem has always been
there or just recently introduced.
Yes, this bug have to be introduced in one of the newer revisions. 3.0-424 haven't got this graphical glitches.
Should i use ICC Optimized builds if i have an AMD Processor
http://techreport.com/discussions/8547
Quote:If the program detects a "Genuine Intel" microprocessor, it executes a fully optimized code path and operates with maximum efficiency. However, if the program detects an "Authentic AMD" microprocessor, it executes a different code path that will degrade the program's performance or cause it to crash.
Quote:Yes, this bug have to be introduced in one of the newer revisions. 3.0-424 haven't got this graphical glitches.
It's rather blur then glitches and it have it everywhere instead of menu. Anyway it's better to play it stable then with super-duper graphic and freezes about 30 minutes.
(03-03-2012, 09:45 PM)bjakja Wrote: [ -> ]Quote:Yes, this bug have to be introduced in one of the newer revisions. 3.0-424 haven't got this graphical glitches.
It's rather blur then glitches and it have it everywhere instead of menu. Anyway it's better to play it stable then with super-duper graphic and freezes about 30 minutes.
OK, Lectrode, maybe its too much to ask. Would you make special build on dolphin r6505 / r6515 with fifobusy branch latest commit for fix FIFO bug (3 latest commit by skidau) ? is it compatible ?
http://code.google.com/p/dolphin-emu/source/list?name=FifoBusy
TLS is very demanding game. Latest rev even give me slower speed & blur problem (blur problem doesn;t appear on r65xx).
Thx for your consideration.
(03-03-2012, 11:19 PM)cloud101090 Wrote: [ -> ]Would you make special build on dolphin r6505 / r6515 with fifobusy branch latest commit for fix FIFO bug (3 latest commit by skidau) ? is it compatible ?
No, that won't work. You're basically asking him to apply the changes which made current revs become slower than r6505 on r6505.