03-05-2017, 03:03 AM
Does run the ryzen 7 chips all games in fullspeed? the benchmarks are interesting, but even with them I can't know how good tp, galaxy 1/2 etc run with that cpu.
Quote:“In addition to Lisa’s comments, there are also some variables that could affect performance:
1) Early motherboard BIOSes were certainly troubled: disabling unrelated features would turn off cores. Setting memory overclocks on some motherboards would disable boost. Some BIOS revisions would plain produce universally suppressed performance.
2) Ryzen benefits from disabling High Precision Event Timers (HPET). The timer resolution of HPET can cause an observer effect that can subtract performance. This is a BIOS option, or a function that can be disabled from the Windows command shell.
3) Ryzen benefits from enabling the High Performance power profile. This overrides core parking. Eventually we will have a driver that allows people to stay on balanced and disable core parking anyways. Gamers have been doing this for a while, too. I misspoke, here. I want to clarify the benefit: High Performance mode allows the CPU to update its voltage/clockspeed in 1ms, vs. the 30ms that it takes balanced mode. This is what our driver will accomplish. Apologies for the confusion!
(03-05-2017, 06:10 AM)DarkHacker Wrote: [ -> ]Ryzen really have some problems...
http://wccftech.com/amd-ryzen-launch-aftermath-gaming-performance-amd-response/
https://forums.anandtech.com/threads/ryzen-strictly-technical.2500572/page-8#post-38775732 Wrote:I did some 3D testing and eventhou there is not nearly enough data to confirm it, I'd say the SMT regression is infact a Windows 10 related issue.
In 3D testing I did recently on Windows 10, the title which illustrated the biggest SMT regression was Total War: Warhammer.
All of these were recorded at 3.5GHz, 2133MHz MEMCLK with R9 Nano:
Windows 10 - 1080 Ultra DX11:
8C/16T - 49.39fps (Min), 72.36fps (Avg)
8C/8T - 57.16fps (Min), 72.46fps (Avg)
Windows 7 - 1080 Ultra DX11:
8C/16T - 62.33fps (Min), 78.18fps (Avg)
8C/8T - 62.00fps (Min), 73.22fps (Avg)
At the moment this is just pure speculation as there were variables, which could not be isolated.
Windows 10 figures were recorded using PresentMon (OCAT), however with Windows 7 it was necessary to use Fraps.
(03-05-2017, 04:18 PM)Nintendo Maniac 64 Wrote: [ -> ]I just realized - Dolphin's performance relative to other software is kind of the opposite between Haswell and Ryzen.
Haswell had 5-10% faster IPC than Ivy Bridge overall, but was ~30% faster per-GHz in Dolphin.
Ryzen has 0-1% faster IPC than Broadwell-E overall, but is ~30% slower per-GHz in Dolphin.
These sound more like BIOS and OS-side issues to me, especially in light of the following:
Quick, somebody try the Dolphin benchmark with Ryzen on Windows 7!
(Linux kernel 4.9.10 might also work)
Quote:What games are most demanding for Dolphin?The Last Story with EFB to Ram
![[Image: the_last_story-8.jpg]](http://www.gamnesia.com/images/uploads/the_last_story-8.jpg)
(03-06-2017, 01:18 AM)admin89 Wrote: [ -> ]The Last Story with EFB to Ram
Especially this scene
Or when you fight with overlords (big monsters like dragon queen, black and white dragon...) . The FPS will drop dramatically but as long as you use low IR like 1x or 2x (internal resolution) , you can probably make it run full speed againInside the castle: (Show Spoiler)
Higher IR = Higher CPU requirement + Higher GPU requirement
I think you should start with 3xIR at least
, but I'll do it when I get home tonight. How far in the game is that scene?Quote:How far in the game is that scene?You have to beat the first boss then the second boss . You can run away if you don't want to fight the 2nd boss , it's quite nasty (lv.90 monster right off the bat )