The fact that Wii games look the way they do with HD at 60fps in Steroscopic 3D with other enhancements proves what about Nintendo?
Err... moved to Delfino Plaza
Proves their graphics artists cried in their sleep over the Wii?
(11-05-2015, 09:13 AM)KHRZ Wrote: [ -> ]Proves their graphics artists cried in their sleep over the Wii?
If I could like posts on this forum, I would definitely give you one. That made me laugh pretty hard.
It proves that nintendo focuses on making timeless games without the most realistic art styles. Games that tried to have a realistic art style from around that same period have not aged nearly as well.
(11-05-2015, 01:35 PM)piccolo289 Wrote: [ -> ]Games that tried to have a realistic art style from around that same period have not aged nearly as well.
If you do not mind me asking, specifically which games did you have in mind? I honestly cannot think of any games with what was at the time a "realistic art style" made by Nintendo that have aged poorly.
(11-11-2015, 11:20 AM)Red Buzzy Beetle Wrote: [ -> ]If you do not mind me asking, specifically which games did you have in mind? I honestly cannot think of any games with what was at the time a "realistic art style" made by Nintendo that have aged poorly.
I think the point was that companies other than Nintendo make games with more realistic art styles.
Twilight Princess looks bad?
(11-12-2015, 04:18 AM)DatKid20 Wrote: [ -> ]Twilight Princess looks bad?
I know you were probably not addressing me, but I will say it any ways; I personally do not think Twilight Princess looks bad at all.
Nah I agree with what you said before. Nintendo games with realistic art styles haven't aged badly.