You already made the issue reports, why are you posting this here? Please be patient, the devs know about it and are considering what to do.
And please don't put rXXXX for the numbers! We use the 4.0- system for a reason.
I understand but why is this not critical?
It's a main feature regression, unless you are thinking otherwise.
No feedback for a week either
here,
here or
here.
*sigh* Dolphin is being made by volunteer developers, who spend their free time working on Dolphin because they enjoy it. This entire emulator, alllll of this progress, was made by people working for free because they enjoy it! But Dolphin is not a corporation where we can just devote a resolution team to the problem and they'll fix it in a day! Problems are addressed and fixed
as developers choose to pick up and work on these issues. Please be patient! You have reported the issue, they know about it, so eventually it will be resolved. Now it's up to a developer to choose to do the work with their own free time.
eckso Wrote:I understand but why is this not critical?
It's a main feature regression, unless you are thinking otherwise.
Stereoscopic vision is neat, but it is not exactly a "main feature", considering how it was added and totally ignored for years.
Armada made it his mission to recreate it, and he did! He'll most likely be the one to take care of these problems too. But he's been really busy lately...
The ticket is already accepted for resolve, but nobody is assigned yet.
To answer your *sigh* over emotional response, stereoscopic 3D is a main stand-alone feature.
The problem as I explained recently
here is that the commit should had never been accepted to start with, because it was a chunk of flawed code that a random one-day developer threw there for self needs. If I'm not wrong, in these cases we revert ASAP the commit (a regression fix) until the code is properly fixed and tested, yet here we are, 3 months later and no proper stereoscopic 3D (unless you want to play how the guy fancied - random presets).
Currently the last working version is 4.0-7921. But there's still the issue of
stereo+AA. At least on Mario Kart Wii very similar to
this seemingly resolved issue. Maybe someone can double check?
(12-07-2015, 01:30 AM)eckso Wrote: [ -> ]... the commit should had never been accepted to start with, because it was a chunk of flawed code that a random one-day developer threw there for self needs.
The difference is that this "random one-day developer" actually implemented a new feature that some users were requesting. And you're the random guy demanding the feature to be reverted just because the regression you discovered wasn't fixed as soon as you reported it. So, between two random guys I would still pick the one who coded a new feature in the emulator instead of the one that is just complaining and demanding things to be resolved as if he owned the emulator
BTW, Dolphin is open-source, you can freely fork the emulator and compile your own build with this change reverted if you're too impatient to wait for a fix, or better yet, you could fix the issue yourself and then submit a new PR for review.
(12-07-2015, 04:11 AM)Jhonn Wrote: [ -> ]And you're the random guy demanding the feature to be reverted just because the regression you discovered wasn't fixed as soon as you reported it.
Now you dispel "warnings" to people with opposing ideas? I write because I can, if you don't like do not reply or censor. I am a "random" poster that "random" developers care more to argue with than reason with, and the proof is how two "content creators" (whatever that tells about a random guy/gal) chime in to do nothing else than say "I am right you are wrong", like little kids.
If you can't see past through that and reason why regressions shouldn't be reverted ASAP as it's been constantly done, or even have a glance at the AA issues, maybe is because you are straight out-of-focus, and won't find dialogue with me.
In my opinion exchanging a bug that disables a major feature (stereo 3D) for a minor feature (3 depth presets) is a flaw-by-design, and should be revised not the bug itself, but how regressions are handled.
(12-07-2015, 04:11 AM)Jhonn Wrote: [ -> ]BTW, Dolphin is open-source, you can freely fork the emulator and compile your own build with this change reverted if you're too impatient to wait for a fix, or better yet, you could fix the issue yourself and then submit a new PR for review.
I could and I won't. Not impatient, just baffled.
(over-sensitive smiley goes here-> 
)
3D is nothing close to a major feature. Major features for an emulator are things like speedups, accuracy improvements, and other such things that any user can take advantage of. 3D with Dolphin is a pretty niche feature.
(12-08-2015, 02:47 AM)eckso Wrote: [ -> ]Now you dispel "warnings" to people with opposing ideas? I write because I can, if you don't like do not reply or censor.
Just FYI, it wasn't me who issued the warning. Also, warnings are not issued for no reason or to "censor" people, if you got a warning you did something to receive it, so, watch your manners.
(12-08-2015, 02:47 AM)eckso Wrote: [ -> ]...and the proof is how two "content creators" (whatever that tells about a random guy/gal) chime in to do nothing else than say "I am right you are wrong", like little kids.
Nobody said "I am right, you're wrong". If that's all you could get off our previous replies, it's not our problem, go re-read them.
(12-08-2015, 02:47 AM)eckso Wrote: [ -> ]If you can't see past through that and reason why regressions shouldn't be reverted ASAP as it's been constantly done, or even have a glance at the AA issues, maybe is because you are straight out-of-focus, and won't find dialogue with me.
The number of reverts got hugely decreased after Dolphin moved to GitHub with its Pull Request system. Generally, if something slips out of PR testing, an issue is opened and it remains open until someone submits a new PR with a fix. You already opened the issue so all you can do now is wait (or as I said, if you have coding skills you can try to fix it yourself and then submit a new PR -- it's a community-driven project after all). Things are reverted ASAP only in case of issues considered critical by the developers or problems that affects a huge part of the user base, and we can safely say that stereoscopy doesn't fit in any of those "high priority" categories (to the extent it remained broken for years and even then nobody complained before getting to the state it's now).
(12-08-2015, 02:47 AM)eckso Wrote: [ -> ]I could and I won't. Not impatient, just baffled.
You made your choice. Just wait then.
I'll ping the relevant people; tbh I missed your issues.