11-19-2013, 10:44 AM
(11-19-2013, 10:36 AM)AnyOldName3 Wrote: [ -> ]As for Haswell's performance, if it helps I can play the first two (and maybe more) galaxies of SMG1 at fullspeed without an overclock on my 4670K.Is that with LLE audio?
(11-19-2013, 10:36 AM)AnyOldName3 Wrote: [ -> ]As for Haswell's performance, if it helps I can play the first two (and maybe more) galaxies of SMG1 at fullspeed without an overclock on my 4670K.Is that with LLE audio?
(11-20-2013, 10:20 AM)NaturalViolence Wrote: [ -> ]That doesn't make any sense. What problem are you trying to solve? What are you afraid will go wrong? Are you having overheating issues at stock with your cpu?I really doubt that. My i7 930 has the IHS soldered onto the cpu unlike the haswell cpu, which uses shitty thermal paste between the ihs and the die. In theory, it should run cooler, but because of this, it won't.
Haswell reaches about the same temps as ivy at stock. When overclocked it caps out at the same temperature as sandy/ivy bridge. The only difference is that it hits that temperature at a lower clock rate. But that doesn't matter because the IPC is so much higher that it will still outperform its predecessors even at a lower clock rate.
And if your profile is correct your current cpu should run much hotter at the same clock rate.
(11-20-2013, 11:33 PM)Anti-Ultimate Wrote: [ -> ]I really doubt that. My i7 930 has the IHS soldered onto the cpu unlike the haswell cpu, which uses shitty thermal paste between the ihs and the die. In theory, it should run cooler, but because of this, it won't.
Anti-Ultimate Wrote:I really doubt that. My i7 930 has the IHS soldered onto the cpu unlike the haswell cpu, which uses shitty thermal paste between the ihs and the die.
Anti-Ultimate Wrote:In theory, it should run cooler, but because of this, it won't.
Anti-Ultimate Wrote:but I'll certainly wait until Broadwell arrives to figure out if Intel didn't solder the IHS on the CPU again or not.
(11-21-2013, 08:29 AM)NaturalViolence Wrote: [ -> ]Then tell me why people delid those cpu's then if they run that cool anyways. There is several proof all over the internet, just google.Anti-Ultimate Wrote:I really doubt that. My i7 930 has the IHS soldered onto the cpu unlike the haswell cpu, which uses shitty thermal paste between the ihs and the die.
You have no reason to believe this will outweigh the massively lower TDP. Tests have shown the TIM to make only a few degrees difference.
Anti-Ultimate Wrote:In theory, it should run cooler, but because of this, it won't.
Proof?
There is just no way in hell that will outweigh the massively lower TDP. Haswell at stock speeds runs at similar temps despite having a much higher clock rate. Now imagine how it would do at the same clock rates.
Anti-Ultimate Wrote:but I'll certainly wait until Broadwell arrives to figure out if Intel didn't solder the IHS on the CPU again or not.
It's not going to happen. All non enthusiast (E series) Intel cpus from here on out will use TIM. As the TDP drops even lower there will be even less of a reason to use fluxless solder. Your fear of this is extremely irrational. Many people have already upgraded to these news cpus and have had no issues overclocking them to the same clock rates as nehalem on the same cooling units. What you're essentially telling me is "I won't upgrade no matter how much better it is if it uses fluxless solder. Fluxless solder is all I care about, not the end result." which is just stubborn.