High-end Nvidia GTX 670 is powerful enough to handle 4xIR(2560x2112), 4xMSAA (direct3D11) , 16xAF in any game
Why would he have to use the ugly native resolution ?
Anisotropic Filtering will not affect performance at all unless you use an ancient GPU
Even Intel HD 1st gen can handle 16xAF just fine
i poor folk
running gpu and cpu to max is not good and very high temperature
not running max is to maintain safe gpu and cpu temperature in min to max gaming long hours example 24hr gaming or 12hr gaming or 6hr gaming
is not good to run torture very high setting at the cost of hardware
maintain this good habit long life for your com about 5 years
Do you even know what you're talking about ?
I can't understand him. His English is too broken.
decode broken word for you to understand
very high graphic setting will cost your computer very high temperature and high cpu load and long hour will result heat damage example Gpu , ram, hdd, cpu, motherboard
graphic low setting or medium setting and take good care for your hardware will last to 5year
.....that didn't really help. And it seems very random since it doesn't have anything to do with what we're talking about or the thread topic.
I think he's saying you shouldn't set the IR+AA too high because you'll melt your GPU.
I'm not sure he understands that modern hardware has many ways of preventing itself from becoming heat damaged under normal conditions.
He's technically correct. Running hardware at higher temperatures reduces lifespan. It will still last a really long time though and it's meant to be used that way. Likely still 5+ years. As far as torture tests go it's not going to cause any significant damage as it will only be on for a few hours. And you have to use them to test for stability when overclocking.
What I don't see is what this has to do with anything. I think he brought it up because admin mentioned the high settings that a GTX 670 is capable of. So he chimed in explaining why he doesn't use high settings.
Alright that was (for the most part), great information.
I also have a SFF system that has an i3 550. I can get a low-profile ATI 6570 or 6670 at a reasonable price. Would that run the game at 100% ya think? I can upgrade the CPU to an i5-680 at the most I think if that's necessary.
(07-08-2013, 06:44 AM)arrow_runner Wrote: [ -> ]I also have a SFF system that has an i3 550. I can get a low-profile ATI 6570 or 6670 at a reasonable price. Would that run the game at 100% ya think? I can upgrade the CPU to an i5-680 at the most I think if that's necessary.
For most games neither i3 550 nor i5 680 will give you 100% speed. A correct performance but not 100%.
Which game(s) are you planning to play?