(03-17-2013, 08:12 AM)rpglord Wrote: [ -> ]Trolling is beeing a jerk while lying 
Nobody is saying it isnt posible to get fps you are getting in various parts of the game
Problem is main city, thats where its slowest.
I dont think your cpu should perform much different then mine, so show us screenshoots in the city
You should be getting around 20 fps, few fps less or more
I agree that fps is not important if it playable, but 20 fps is too slow, especially if you have NTSC version, since its only 66% of the normal speed
Point taken. By the way thanks for answering my original question. That's what I wanted to discuss. Anyone have a Lazulis city save? I've been stuck where I'm at for a few revisions. I could cheat my way through but I'd prefer not to.
Ok point taken again. Had an old save backed up. Lazulis city, 21-24 fps unless I'm in an alleyway. Well I guess you learn. It still is fun, and I didn't mean to bs anyone.
(03-17-2013, 08:25 AM)tsukasa80 Wrote: [ -> ]Ok point taken again. Had an old save backed up. Lazulis city, 21-24 fps unless I'm in an alleyway. Well I guess you learn. It still is fun, and I didn't mean to bs anyone.
As expected. I have to say I am a little disapointed, there was some hope you maybe found some way to speed up dolphin or alteast last story
(03-17-2013, 08:40 AM)rpglord Wrote: [ -> ] (03-17-2013, 08:25 AM)tsukasa80 Wrote: [ -> ]Ok point taken again. Had an old save backed up. Lazulis city, 21-24 fps unless I'm in an alleyway. Well I guess you learn. It still is fun, and I didn't mean to bs anyone.
As expected. I have to say I am a little disapointed, there was some hope you maybe found some way to speed up dolphin or alteast last story
Well, give my ini a try. Couldn't hurt, you have better hardware than me see what happens. Maybe it wont be a complete waste after all.
(03-17-2013, 07:42 AM)tsukasa80 Wrote: [ -> ]this started as a discussion about whether or not anyone really thinks fps is such an important factor if you can play the game
No. This isn't an important factor as long as the game is playable. A game can be fully playable without getting full-speed
Definition of trolling:
Urban Dictionary Wrote:The art of deliberately, cleverly, and secretly pissing people off, usually via the internet, using dialogue. Trolling does not mean just making rude remarks: Shouting swear words at someone doesn't count as trolling; it's just flaming, and isn't funny. Spam isn't trolling either; it pisses people off, but it's lame.
The most essential part of trolling is convincing your victim that either a) truly believe in what you are saying, no matter how outrageous, or b) give your victim malicious instructions, under the guise of help.
Trolling requires decieving; any trolling that doesn't involve decieving someone isn't trolling at all; it's just stupid. As such, your victim must not know that you are trolling; if he does, you are an unsuccesful troll.
It is not lying and it is not being a jerk.
It has lost a lot of its original meaning since most people use the term as an insult towards anyone that they dislike without understand its intended meaning.
(03-17-2013, 09:24 AM)LordVador Wrote: [ -> ] (03-17-2013, 07:42 AM)tsukasa80 Wrote: [ -> ]this started as a discussion about whether or not anyone really thinks fps is such an important factor if you can play the game
No. This isn't an important factor as long as the game is playable. A game can be fully playable without getting full-speed
I agree but add that "playable" is very subjective and personal. For me SMG +LLE is not playable if it is consistently less than ~55 FPS. The audio stutter kills me.
(03-17-2013, 04:14 PM)NaturalViolence Wrote: [ -> ]Definition of trolling:
Urban Dictionary Wrote:The art of deliberately, cleverly, and secretly pissing people off, usually via the internet, using dialogue. Trolling does not mean just making rude remarks: Shouting swear words at someone doesn't count as trolling; it's just flaming, and isn't funny. Spam isn't trolling either; it pisses people off, but it's lame.
The most essential part of trolling is convincing your victim that either a) truly believe in what you are saying, no matter how outrageous, or b) give your victim malicious instructions, under the guise of help.
Trolling requires decieving; any trolling that doesn't involve decieving someone isn't trolling at all; it's just stupid. As such, your victim must not know that you are trolling; if he does, you are an unsuccesful troll.
It is not lying and it is not being a jerk.
It has lost a lot of its original meaning since most people use the term as an insult towards anyone that they dislike without understand its intended meaning.
It is lying, isnt decieving=lying ? Most of the time, you cant deceive somebody without lying to them.
And I personally consider anyone who deceive people for his own fun a jerk
(03-17-2013, 04:14 PM)NaturalViolence Wrote: [ -> ]Urban Dictionary Wrote:Trolling requires decieving; any trolling that doesn't involve decieving someone isn't trolling at all
Is "decieve" a US form for "deceive" or just a mistake in this text? If this is a mistake I'm surprised you didn't notice this
(03-17-2013, 06:37 PM)Xalphenos Wrote: [ -> ] (03-17-2013, 09:24 AM)LordVador Wrote: [ -> ] (03-17-2013, 07:42 AM)tsukasa80 Wrote: [ -> ]this started as a discussion about whether or not anyone really thinks fps is such an important factor if you can play the game
No. This isn't an important factor as long as the game is playable. A game can be fully playable without getting full-speed
I agree but add that "playable" is very subjective and personal. For me SMG +LLE is not playable if it is consistently less than ~55 FPS. The audio stutter kills me.
You're right. I should've said:
(03-17-2013, 09:24 AM)LordVador Wrote: [ -> ]This isn't an important factor as long as the game looks playable to you
if u could give me a save file in the city ill show u what fps i would get at 5ghz
rpglord Wrote:It is lying, isnt decieving=lying ?
Yes but as you can see lying by itself is not enough to consider something "trolling".
LordVador Wrote:s "decieve" a US form for "deceive" or just a mistake in this text? If this is a mistake I'm surprised you didn't notice this
I quoted another source (random entry on urban dictionary). This other source misspelled the word.