Dolphin, the GameCube and Wii emulator - Forums

Hmm, where's your chart? Sorry... I feel like a dumbass...

1st page : https://skydrive.live.com/view.aspx?resid=DA2FE7FDA6EB085E!107&app=Excel&authkey=!ALQ0-tZv6Pc_h84

Haha damn I did look at 1st post only to check for last modified date and I stopped there -_-" Thanks.

Could someone give a link to the settings for each benchmark please? The link I have tried failed to load.

The settings are provided as defaults with the benchmark. What do you mean by "failed to load"?

HOLY THREAD RESURRECTION BATMAN!!!!

I always said I'd run this benchmark when I got a decent PC..and I just did so here are my results:

@4.6Ghz (24/7 speed)







1: 112 FPS
2: 88 FPS
3: 132 FPS

@4.8Ghz (Benchmark speed only)







1: 118 FPS
2: 93 FPS
3: 140 FPS

System: (self build)

Corsair Obsidian 450D High Airflow Case
Asus Maximus VII Hero Z97
Intel 4690K @ 4.6Ghz (will go to 4.8)
8GB Kingston HyperX 2400 DDR3
MSI Nvidia 760 OC 2GB
Raijintek Themis CPU Cooler
650w Superflower Leadex Gold PSU
Dell UltraSharp U2414H Monitor
Windows 8.1 64bit

Just registered again to insert my 5 cents for those who wish to make an upgrade. I tried several different ram modules for haswell cpu, Dolphin work 7% faster with overclocking memory 10-11-11-28 2133 compared to 11-11-11-28 1600. Doesn't matter if it shorter timings and low frequency or high frequency and longer timings. So, check out in your config if ram can be replaced with something better with lower timings and higher frequency at same time. Dunno how is it for AMD cpu or non Haswell (lga2011 may run faster).

Lower timings having the same effect as an increase in bandwidth is basically impossible on modern hardware so I have to question your testing methodology.

I saw same results in benchmark of Metro2033 game on overclockers site, which is have better performance from lower timings at lower frequency (of course it's rare scenario, i accept that).
Well, about the tests i tried. Don't remember timings of value rams of 1600mhz, but cl10 and cl11, though they had the same performance because of some other timings compencation. Atm i'm using Kingston Savage memory. When it set to 1600 МГц 11-11-11-28, performance in the same as older two i tried. It have two XMP profiles, these:
@ 1066 МГц 11-12-12-30 (CL-RCD-RP-RAS) / 48-278-2-7-16-8-8-32-11 (RC-RFC-CR-RRD-WR-WTR-RTP-FAW-WCL)
@ 800 МГц 9-9-9-27 (CL-RCD-RP-RAS) / 36-208-0-5-12-6-6-24-8 (RC-RFC-CR-RRD-WR-WTR-RTP-FAW-WCL)
Using both give the same +7% performance boost for me (i5-4690k, gf650ti dx11 mode in small window).

PS: i'm not frequent visitor of this place (old account deleted because of that), so please do not ask me anything, such tests can be done by anyone easily, i just wrote my own experience.

OS: Windows 8.1 x64
CPU: Stock 6600k
GPU: 750Ti SC
RAM: 16GB

Save 1:
101/202/336


Save 2:
77/155/258


Save 3:
115/230/383