cole.roddy Wrote:You're not lieng, you just pressed the printscreen key before the emulator had the chance to stabilize the fps. Wait for the game to load and stabilize the fps, and press printscreen after that, not before. Otherwise, your results will be affected. In other words: don't press the key too soon.
Indeed. This is the only way he could have produced those results. His system is scoring 3-5 times the performance of comparable hardware.
RDilus: Any time you're ready to give your valid results, we're all ready. Maybe the third time will be the one?

Besides, if you're running with the default settings (IRx1) it doesn't matter if you have a Titan or a HD5850. The results are not affected. CPU is the major factor here. I tried to OC my GPU and the results were the same. If IRx2 or bigger, then you're doing it wrong.
okay guys i decided to squeeze maximum performance out of my chip again and this time the highest stable my ram allows me to go.
5ghz /w my ram overclocked to 1600mhz @ 8-9-8-16 timings
saw slight improvements in numbers.
test 1 - 111 fps
test 2 - 84 fps
test 3 - 132 fps

(04-22-2013, 04:22 AM)cole.roddy Wrote: [ -> ] (04-21-2013, 07:03 PM)RDilus Wrote: [ -> ] (04-21-2013, 06:53 PM)admin89 Wrote: [ -> ]I really doubt the result . There is no way i7 3770k @ 4.7GHz could be twice as fast as i5 3570k @ 5.0GHz
Dolphin is a dual core application , Dolphin doesn't support Hyper Threading
And since Zelda WW is a light-weight game . There is no way GTX Titan could bottleneck the CPU ( Save 1 : 3xIR - 97FPS , 1xIR - 192FPS ) . I tried drop down IR from 3xIR to 1xIR , there is almost no speed up
If a better GPU can give this much speed up in Dolphin then this CPU benchmark will fail
lol basicly you are saying i'm lieng....
You're not lieng, you just pressed the printscreen key before the emulator had the chance to stabilize the fps. Wait for the game to load and stabilize the fps, and press printscreen after that, not before. Otherwise, your results will be affected. In other words: don't press the key too soon.
This is what happens if I press printscreen too soon in my rig.
save 1
![[Image: save1toosoon.jpg]](http://img560.imageshack.us/img560/8164/save1toosoon.jpg)
uhh no i dindt do that i waited for like 30 seconds...
(04-22-2013, 04:37 AM)Starscream Wrote: [ -> ]RDilus: Any time you're ready to give your valid results, we're all ready. Maybe the third time will be the one? 
lol i swear i waited 30 seconds...before i pressed ps
Ok update about the high framerate i had..
It turns out the OC Tuner on my Asus MB pushed the CPU all the way to 6.5Ghz with a vcore of 1.6....and my max temp was 100c....(no wonder i had bluescreens in intelburn test)
So my results are valid and again if you don't believe me ill push the CPU-Z validation (if it not turns in a bluescreen)
(04-22-2013, 06:15 PM)RDilus Wrote: [ -> ]Ok update about the high framerate i had..
It turns out the OC Tuner on my Asus MB pushed the CPU all the way to 6.5Ghz with a vcore of 1.6....and my max temp was 100c....(no wonder i had bluescreens in intelburn test)
So my results are valid and again if you don't believe me ill push the CPU-Z validation (if it not turns in a bluescreen)
Even at 6.5Ghz those results are incorrect, if you look at the results of someone with the same chip minus HT at 5ghz you have more than twice the FPS which is impossible for a 1.5ghz higher clock speed. You would get significantly higher sure like 30-35fps perhaps depending on scaling but not 140fps+.
I think I can speak for everyone when I say that we're not going to use the results that RDilus has posted. They're just not accurate or reliable.
(04-22-2013, 06:15 PM)RDilus Wrote: [ -> ]Ok update about the high framerate i had..
It turns out the OC Tuner on my Asus MB pushed the CPU all the way to 6.5Ghz with a vcore of 1.6....and my max temp was 100c....(no wonder i had bluescreens in intelburn test)
So my results are valid and again if you don't believe me ill push the CPU-Z validation (if it not turns in a bluescreen)
im surprised your chip didnt burn out immediately... or even boot. i would like to see a cpu validation of that 6.5ghz. pretty sure you would need to delid and use LN2 cooling to reach those speeds on ivybridge...
and or your motherboard is displaying a false voltage/ oc.
no way in hell OC tuner would go that high normally.. its supposed to be for moderate overclocks for noobs. not to burn out chips lol.