Quote: 4.8ghz with 1.5v, ON AIR
That's a pretty high voltage IMO. I had my CPU stable-ish at 5GHz with 1.42v (still need to test it further though).
What are your temperatures at load?
Thanks for the benchmarks MaJoR.
I'll be comparing with those OC'd results later.
@bret
No, technically the Ivy Bridge should be slightly faster than a Sandy Bridge in every scenario.
1.5v on a 22nm cpu, oh god I'm surprised you he didn't immediately fry the chip.
(05-14-2012, 08:29 AM)NaturalViolence Wrote: [ -> ]1.5v on a 22nm cpu, oh god I'm surprised you he didn't immediately fry the chip.
My Dad's 2500k workstation Auto Overclocked to 4.5 ghz @ 1.450 volts.
We shortly set it to 4.0 ghz and 1.295 volts.
And that's a 32nm.
(05-14-2012, 09:33 AM)werewolfyman Wrote: [ -> ] (05-14-2012, 08:29 AM)NaturalViolence Wrote: [ -> ]1.5v on a 22nm cpu, oh god I'm surprised you he didn't immediately fry the chip.
My Dad's 2500k workstation Auto Overclocked to 4.5 ghz @ 1.450 volts.
We shortly set it to 4.0 ghz and 1.295 volts.
And that's a 32nm.
the max voltage decreases... with the cpu size
0,8 µm
first pentiums needed nearly 5 volts to run...
180 nm
pentium 3 could endure 2 volts
130 nm
first pentium 4 had an default vcore of 1.75 volts...
22nm undervolted ivybridge
22nm overclocked ivybridge