Dolphin, the GameCube and Wii emulator - Forums

Full Version: The Elder Scrolls: Skyrim
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
Yeah, it's the price they pay for trying to develop complex interactive games where the player can do virtually anything.
Seems like they aren't evening even trying with Skyrim. How did ash piles not disappearing get past QA when most of us found out the 2nd time we played the game and why did it take so long to fix when its probably a cause of lag on PS3.
(01-29-2012, 04:32 AM)Gabriel Belmont Wrote: [ -> ]Bethesda/Obsidian whatever you call them have real nice history when it comes to bugs.
I don't know about the Elder Scrolls series but Fallout 3 and Fallout New Vegas have plentiful and it's almost required that you save as often as you can if you want to go for a perfect 100% good character run.
I'm excited about the Fallout New Vegas ultimate edition for PS3 to see if something more have been fixed.
sure, but with complex and full of events driven games like elder scrolls games its bound to happen
Yeah I know and I have been pretty spared from the worst bugs since I played both Fallout 3 and New Vegas on the PC. There is numerous console commands and mods that fix some bugs so it have been a fairly smooth ride there.
I'm gonna play them both on the PS3 once ultimate edition have been released of New Vegas, it should be quite a interesting experience.
yay, I can run this game on my pc, NaturalViolence, u are wrong! I can run at 800x450 on low! Yays
(01-31-2012, 08:55 AM)pwnedatdolphin Wrote: [ -> ]yay, I can run this game on my pc, NaturalViolence, u are wrong! I can run at 800x450 on low! Yays

Uh... 800x450, that's an odd resolution combination? I've never heard of it before.
Does that even look normal?
Quote:yay, I can run this game on my pc, NaturalViolence, u are wrong! I can run at 800x450 on low! Yays

And what framerate are you getting?

There is a difference between running the game and running the game WELL.
I'm not sure of the exact framerate, but it is very smooth on low settings. And @GabrielMont, 800x450 I do believe is the 16:9 format of 800x600.
16:9 version of 800 x 600 is 1066 x 600, you always keep the height the same unless you're using a letterbox format. So technically 800 x 450 is the 16:9 version of 600 x 450.
Well it's still smooth, so I'm having fun Smile I wonder if I could turn on FXAA, there is a lot of noticeable aliasing in the trees... But that will be fixed when I get my new rig in a couple weeks. Smile
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21