12-04-2011, 04:55 AM
Going to PM SS about this to keep the thread free of unnecessary drama.
I agree with this, but I also think that there is a bit more to it then that. I think AMDs lead engineers were living in a fantasy world where general applications would be massively multithreaded by 2011.
Quote:Bulldozer is AMD's equivalent of Pentium 4. In almost every aspect they copied a failed architecture from the past in principle. They lowered IPC while trying to increase frequency at the same time to compensate for that weakness. And surprise - surprise, it didn't work as planned...
I agree with this, but I also think that there is a bit more to it then that. I think AMDs lead engineers were living in a fantasy world where general applications would be massively multithreaded by 2011.