04-03-2011, 07:45 AM
Pages: 1 2
04-03-2011, 07:47 AM
What does that mean?
04-03-2011, 08:11 AM
Latest revision description (7435): Revert r7086. Preferring the slow code until it gets optimized properly...
04-03-2011, 08:33 AM
I said "revert", not "revert to" ...
04-03-2011, 12:37 PM
(04-03-2011, 08:33 AM)NeoBrain Wrote: [ -> ]I said "revert", not "revert to" ...
"revert" used by itself is not grammatically correct. That is why the OP and any other people who knows English grammar are confused.
04-03-2011, 02:41 PM
Only r7086 was reverted.
04-03-2011, 04:37 PM
(04-03-2011, 12:37 PM)gaiachaos Wrote: [ -> ](04-03-2011, 08:33 AM)NeoBrain Wrote: [ -> ]I said "revert", not "revert to" ...
"revert" used by itself is not grammatically correct. That is why the OP and any other people who knows English grammar are confused.
actually, as english has it, revert is the correct VERB.
revert in this context is as reverting the changes of that revision.
its ok, alot of english people absolutely suck at using and understanding the language.
04-04-2011, 04:54 AM
Quote:its ok, alot of english people absolutely suck at using and understanding the language.
![[Image: oh_no_you_didnt.gif]](http://thepqnation.com/livingwicked/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/oh_no_you_didnt.gif)
Sorry, couldn't help it.
04-04-2011, 09:27 PM
(04-03-2011, 12:37 PM)gaiachaos Wrote: [ -> ](04-03-2011, 08:33 AM)NeoBrain Wrote: [ -> ]I said "revert", not "revert to" ...
"revert" used by itself is not grammatically correct. That is why the OP and any other people who knows English grammar are confused.
this post is a joke, right? sorry, i mean; 'right, this post is jokings?'
04-05-2011, 03:39 AM
(04-04-2011, 09:27 PM)turingpest Wrote: [ -> ]this post is a joke, right? sorry, i mean; 'right, this post is jokings?'i believe you just failed on your joke
Pages: 1 2