can you please compile these
x64
r5351
r5352
thanks
Can you compile the latest version of Dolphin 32-bit SSE4a with
this 
is that a macro definition???? it dosent look i would be able to compile dolphin with that..................and besides sse4a is a scam and dosent support sse4.....i can do it sse3 which would give you a better speed boost than that could ever give u..........
head on over to the link in my signature for the latest build
(02-21-2011, 03:06 AM)shawnanastasio Wrote: [ -> ]is that a macro definition????
I think so
(02-21-2011, 03:06 AM)shawnanastasio Wrote: [ -> ]it dosent look i would be able to compile dolphin with that.
Could you try
(02-21-2011, 03:06 AM)shawnanastasio Wrote: [ -> ]i can do it sse3 which would give you a better speed boost than that could ever give u..........
Really why
sure i could try, and sse3 would give you more speed because
1. sse4 would be faster than sse3 but sse4a is not really sse4.
2. The Intel c++ compiler offers better optimization than just adding a macro definition
(02-21-2011, 05:32 AM)shawnanastasio Wrote: [ -> ]sure i could try, and sse3 would give you more speed because
1. sse4 would be faster than sse3 but sse4a is not really sse4.
2. The Intel c++ compiler offers better optimization than just adding a macro definition
ok thanks
I will also test to see which is faster and tell you the results.
When you build dolphin what parts of it do you optimize? i.e. Dolphin.exe, video/audio "plug-ins" etc.
well when i use intel c++ i do the entire thing, but with macro definitions the only one that makes a difference is the VideoCommon project
its compiling....
yeah, dolphin wont compile with any one of those.............but theres always sse3.........i cant wait until amd processors support sse4.........
(02-21-2011, 07:17 AM)shawnanastasio Wrote: [ -> ]yeah, dolphin wont compile with any one of those..............
All well
(02-21-2011, 07:17 AM)shawnanastasio Wrote: [ -> ]i cant wait until amd processors support sse4.........
Too bad that will probably never happen