All of the games in that benchmark are getting 50 fps (almost always 60) or higher with a phenom II X3 except for the rts games....and something seems a little off with that farcry2 benchmark. Those results are way lower than what tomshardware got with the same cpus.
This is more along the lines of what you'll be getting with a typical modern pc game:
http://benchmarkreviews.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=664&Itemid=63&limit=1&limitstart=9
Quote:If you want more review, google sandy bridge
I did and all I got were reviews showing little to no difference in game performance between core 2 quad/core i7/sandy bridge in all but the rts games. Of course it's faster but YOU DON'T NEED IT. At this point an upgrade from core 2 duo to core 2 quad is justifiable if you play a lot of cpu heavy games. But an upgrade from core 2 quad to i7 is still not justifiable get. The GPU is the only bottleneck in 99% of circumstances as long as you have a high end core 2 (for pc games anyways). Your cpu needs to be total shit and you gpu needs to be godly for a cpu upgrade to be beneficial for pc games (except with rts games).
You need a a hexacore to get animated horses and cows.
![[Image: 4901558581_922a537c0e.jpg]](http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4095/4901558581_922a537c0e.jpg)
Sorry guys but can this thread return to the initial topic? The last 2 pages are filled with irrelevant stuff, tnx.
My config
Q6600@3.2Ghz
260GTX OC Core 705/Memory 1140*2/Shader 1410
1*EFB 146 fps
2*EFB 117 fps
3*EFB 112 fps
What are you thinking about these results?Is my CPU bottlenecking my GPU?
(01-12-2011, 04:33 AM)murnau Wrote: [ -> ]My config
Q6600@3.2Ghz
260GTX OC Core 705/Memory 1140*2/Shader 1410
1*EFB 146 fps
2*EFB 117 fps
3*EFB 112 fps
What are you thinking about these results?Is my CPU bottlenecking my GPU?
Judging from these results alone i wouldn't say that. But this is a GPU heavy game, not a cpu heavy one to drive general conclusions.
So I cant do this since I have the pal game?
(01-12-2011, 09:55 PM)emu-muncher Wrote: [ -> ]So I cant do this since I have the pal game?
If you can play the time trial of rainbow road sure you can.
i just make the test and this is the first result
my spec is phenom 2 x4 965 3.4 stock at only 3.6
gtx 470 super overclock
1066 ddr2 hyper x
1x max fps was 179 lowest 155
2x max was 166 lowest 137
3 max was 155 lowest 120
i will make test later with msaa 4x a 9x and after that i will try all with oc cpu at 3.8
(01-12-2011, 11:46 PM)jontcold Wrote: [ -> ]i just make the test and this is the first result
my spec is phenom 2 x4 965 3.4 stock at only 3.6
gtx 470 super overclock
1066 ddr2 hyper x
1x max fps was 179 lowest 155
2x max was 166 lowest 137
3 max was 155 lowest 120
i will make test later with msaa 4x a 9x and after that i will try all with oc cpu at 3.8
gpu clock 700 shader clock 1400 mem clock 837 x4 ithink
(01-12-2011, 11:46 PM)jontcold Wrote: [ -> ]i just make the test and this is the first result
my spec is phenom 2 x4 965 3.4 stock at only 3.6
gtx 470 super overclock
1066 ddr2 hyper x
1x max fps was 179 lowest 155
2x max was 166 lowest 137
3 max was 155 lowest 120
i will make test later with msaa 4x a 9x and after that i will try all with oc cpu at 3.8
(01-12-2011, 11:46 PM)jontcold Wrote: [ -> ]i just make the test and this is the first result
my spec is phenom 2 x4 965 3.4 stock at only 3.6
gtx 470 super overclock
1066 ddr2 hyper x
1x max fps was 179 lowest 155
2x max was 166 lowest 137
3 max was 155 lowest 120
i will make test later with msaa 4x a 9x and after that i will try all with oc cpu at 3.8
gpu clock 700 shader clock 1400 mem clock 837 x4 ithink
Could you post your fps after the race starts (see 1st post pics) since everyone has done it that way till now? Max and min fps of the stage are not very useful, and i probably won't be able to use them.