Dolphin, the GameCube and Wii emulator - Forums

(02-06-2011, 04:11 AM)tuanming Wrote: [ -> ]Erm, so does this thread allow other games benching too? This game isn't quite GPU or CPU intensive enough, and I think we have more than enough data on it already.

it is very possible that the performance of these systems would vary while emulating a wide variety of games. for instance, performing the same benchmark in 2 player split screen mode would probably bring some interesting issues to light.

It would. Which is why we would have to start a new benchmark with a new game and a savegame location.

with the data of the first page about (i7 860) and i have a 9400 gt running pretty good zelda and re 4 most of the games i play how much will be Boosted dolphin with an ati 5970 black edition? cause im getting one soon

Depends on your settings. I would not buy a dual GPU card if I were you. Get a 6970 or GTX 570 instead.

Here it's mine! Default settings.

[color=#FF0000]Cpu: i5 2500k 4.6 ghz
Gpu: Nvidia Gtx 570 905/2050
Ram: G.skill eco 1600 7-8-7-24 2t
All without antialiasing!
[/color]
EFB 1x, 311 fps


EFB 2x, 280 fps


EFB 3x, 188 fps

Got a new CPU for my old LGA 775 motherboard.

PC Specs:
Core 2 Q9400S @3.73Ghz
MSi R6950 Twin Frozr II
G.Skill DDR2 1066Mhz
Asus P5K-E Wifi-AP

MSi r6950 810/1250 (stock)

1x 178
2x 179
3x 175

Note:
1. E6300 @3.73Ghz produced 150-151 fps from 1x -3x efb scale. The Q9400S @3.73Ghz is much faster as the same clock rate/speed.

2. My initial run with the 3x efb scale it boosted up to 180 fps but then i forgot to set frap to capture the frame rate overlay in the screenshot. After I applied the setting to fraps, I could not reproduce the 180 fps in the 3x efb scale. I would probably gain more fps if my motherboard was a 2.0 PCI-E, but unfortunately it's 1.1 specs

---

MSi R6950 overclocked to 987/1375 (Core/Memory) AMD Catalyst 11.2

1x 178 fps
2x 178 fps
[color=#FF0000]3x 187 fps[/color]

1x 4xssaa 187 fps
1x 9xssaa 174 fps

2x 4xssaa 145 fps
2x 9xssaa 71 fps

3x 4xssaa 73 fps
3x 9xssaa 32 fps

Edit: Compared my old E6300 @3.73Ghz MSi r6950 @ 955/1375

1x 4xssaa 151
1x 9xssaa 150

2x 4xssaa 142
2x 9xssaa 70

3x 4xssaa 72 fps
3x 9xssaa 31 fps

(03-03-2011, 05:52 AM)Gabryxx7 Wrote: [ -> ]Here it's mine! Default settings.

[color=#FF0000]Cpu: i5 2500k 4.6 ghz
Gpu: Nvidia Gtx 570 905/2050
Ram: G.skill eco 1600 7-8-7-24 2t
All without antialiasing!
[/color]

Could you please post your benchmark results with antialiasing also? Unreal2004, it would be nice if you could too. It will help those deciding whether to buy a 6970 or a 570.

Q9550 @3.97GHz
MSi R6950 987/1425 (core/memory)
Driver: AMD Catalyst 11.4 (preview)

1x 230
2x 229
3x 222

Note: The overclocked HD 6950 beat the GTX overclocked 570 at 3x efb scale, and I'm not even a Core i7 Sandy Bridge system =)

-----------------------------------------------
CPU: i7 2600k @ 4.5Ghz (OC)
GPU: GFX 580 1.5Gb (GV-N580SO-15I) (855MHz,ShaderClock:1710MHz,Memory:4100MHz(1025MHzx4)) (driver 280.26 win7x64)
Memory: 8Gb(4Gbx2) DDR3 1333 (Dual Chanel)
-----------------------------------------------
FPS Results:

1x efb scale 308 fps, SSAA 4x 308 fps, SSAA 9x 220 fps
2x efb scale 309 fps, SSAA 4x 156 fps, SSAA 9x 77 fps
3x efb scale 229 fps, SSAA 4x 82 fps, SSAA 9x 27 fps

Screens:

Scale x1, fps 308


Uploaded with ImageShack.us
Scale x1, 4ssaa, fps 308


Uploaded with ImageShack.us
Scale x1, 9ssaa, fps 220


Uploaded with ImageShack.us
Scale x2, fps 309


Uploaded with ImageShack.us
Scale x2, 4ssaa, fps 156


Uploaded with ImageShack.us
Scale x2, 9ssaa, fps 77


Uploaded with ImageShack.us
Scale x3, fps 229


Uploaded with ImageShack.us
Scale x3, 4ssaa, fps 82


Uploaded with ImageShack.us
Scale x3, 9ssaa, fps 27


Uploaded with ImageShack.us