Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
(01-16-2011, 12:06 AM)Link_to_the_past Wrote: [ -> ]The data graph along with the formating of the post is updated.
Can't see my results I did post

Post my result please x64 instead of x86 results
Q6600@3.2 260GTX 700/1410/1140
efb * 1 172fps
efb * 2 151 fps
efb * 3 117 fps
(01-16-2011, 05:22 AM)KarstenS Wrote: [ -> ] (01-16-2011, 12:06 AM)Link_to_the_past Wrote: [ -> ]The data graph along with the formating of the post is updated.
Can't see my results I did post 
Oh sorry i skipped that page, i will update them tommorow, for you and murnau.
Windows7 X86
Core i3 530@3.9G, GTS250 1gb (stock settings)
1x efb scale 140 fps
2x efb scale 128 fps
3x efb scale 84 fps
1st post data and graph are updated.
That is an excellent graph! Well done sir.
(01-17-2011, 06:17 AM)NaturalViolence Wrote: [ -> ]That is an excellent graph! Well done sir.
Thanks

.
Anti aliasing data graph is added along with an excel file, making the formating of the original post complete.
ATi x1600 series 500 Core 400 memory (stock)
Core 2 E6300 @3.73Ghz
4GB DDR2 1066Mhz Ram
1x 72
2x 24
3x 11
I boxed up my GTX 460 768mb and let the postal ship it back to Newegg. I will get something that is better than the GTX 460 with atleast 1GB, but I'm currently looking at the HD 6950.
(01-19-2011, 07:28 AM)tuanming Wrote: [ -> ]ATi x1600 series 500 Core 400 memory (stock)
Core 2 E6300 @3.73Ghz
4GB DDR2 1066Mhz Ram
1x 72
2x 24
3x 11
I boxed up my GTX 460 768mb and let the postal ship it back to Newegg. I will get something that is better than the GTX 460 with atleast 1GB, but I'm currently looking at the HD 6950.
1st post data and graphs are updated.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19