• Login
  • Register
  • Dolphin Forums
  • Home
  • FAQ
  • Download
  • Wiki
  • Code


Dolphin, the GameCube and Wii emulator - Forums › Dolphin Emulator Discussion and Support › Support v
« Previous 1 … 576 577 578 579 580 … 1204 Next »

Zelda Twightlight princess low frames
View New Posts | View Today's Posts

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Threaded Mode
Zelda Twightlight princess low frames
01-11-2014, 04:20 PM
#1
PhatSonic
Unregistered
 
Question 
I have low frames in certain areas in twilight princess, as well as my frames being locked to the highest of 30...

Processor: AMD A10- 5800k APU
Video Card: AMD Radeon 7750 Series
Ram: 8 GB

My PC can run most games on high settings...

is there anything i can do to raise frames a little?
Reply
01-11-2014, 04:26 PM
#2
JMC47 Offline
Content Producer
*******
Content Creators (Moderators)
Posts: 6,563
Threads: 31
Joined: Feb 2013
The AMD A10-5800k APU is not a very fast processor in IPC, it will not run all areas of Twilight Princess full speed, notably hyrule field.

Twilight Princess is a 30 fps game, if you see 30 fps, it is going full speed.

I hope this answers your questions.
Find
Reply
01-12-2014, 03:54 AM
#3
KHg8m3r Offline
Doesn't sleep, just Dolphin and Robots
*******
Posts: 6,029
Threads: 4
Joined: Sep 2013
https://forums.dolphin-emu.org/Thread-co...e-slowness
Post #2
Find
Reply
01-12-2014, 04:17 AM (This post was last modified: 01-12-2014, 04:21 AM by admin89.)
#4
admin89 Offline
Overclocker™ ✓ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ
*******
Posts: 6,889
Threads: 127
Joined: Nov 2009
Quote:AMD APU and FX series chips are not very strong in this regard.
They're about as strong as second generation Intel i-series chips.
I'm not sure to say your post is correct or incorrect . There are various types of 2nd gen Core i series (i3 , i5 / i7 with "k" or non-"k" model) . Same to AMD side (AMD FX Bulldozer / Piledriver , AMD Llano / Trinity / Richland )
If you compare the latest FX-8530 or A10 5800k with a non-k (not made for overclocking) i5 2400 . Base on Dolphin Benchmark , they're not even close . You have to push FX 8350 really hard (4.52GHz) to make it faster than i5 2400 . Well you know ... i5 2500k blow it out the water anyway
Laptop:
Clevo W230SS : 3200x1800 IPS | i7 4700MQ @ 3.6GHz (Intel XTU + Triple fan mod) | GTX 860M GDDR5 | 128GB Toshiba CFD SSD | 16GB DDR3L 1600MHz
Aspire 715 43G : 1080p 144Hz |  R5 5625U @ 4.3GHz | Nvidia RTX 3050 4GB | 500GB WD SSD  | 16GB DDR4 3200MHz 
Mini PC ::
G3258 @ 4.6GHz | ELSA GTX 750 | Asrock Z87E ITX | 600W SFX 80+ Gold Silverstone + SG06-LITE | Corsair Vengeance 8GB 2000MHz | Scythe Kozuti + Ao Kaze | 45TB 2.5" Ex HDD (in total) , Zelda Gold Wiimote , LE Wii Classic Controller , Gold LE PS3 DualShock , BlackWidow Chroma ,
Now Playing : Xenoblade Definitive Edition on Yuzu - Switch Emu 

 
Find
Reply
01-12-2014, 04:26 AM
#5
DJBarry004 Offline
Don't even bother...
*******
Posts: 2,456
Threads: 33
Joined: Sep 2013
Not to mention that these "new" AMD cards (7xxx/8xxx series) are FREAKING slow. Mine, for example, hits a max frequency of 400 MHz.
Rig 1: Windows 10 Home | AMD A6-1450 @ 600/1000/1400 MHz | AMD Radeon HD Graphics 8250 | 4GB RAM | HP Pavilion TouchSmart 11.

Rig 2: Windows 10 Pro | Intel Core i7-2640M @ 780/2800/3500 MHz | Intel HD 3000 Mobile | 8GB RAM | Dell Latitude 6320.
Find
Reply
01-12-2014, 11:49 AM (This post was last modified: 01-12-2014, 11:53 AM by kinkinkijkin.)
#6
kinkinkijkin Offline
Human embodiment of the headache caused by a weird issue
****
Posts: 575
Threads: 12
Joined: May 2013
(01-12-2014, 04:26 AM)DJBarry004 Wrote: Not to mention that these "new" AMD cards (7xxx/8xxx series) are FREAKING slow. Mine, for example, hits a max frequency of 400 MHz.

8000 are 7000 OEM Rehash

7000 are almost 3 years old

7000 also have great memory clocks and core speeds, in a way. The operating frequency is not directly tied to the core speed, just like a CPU, wherein a 5 GHz processor is not automatically faster than a 3.5 GHz processor.

Also, you must have a 7600 or lower, keep in mind that anything below "x700" with AMD is equivalent to anything below "x40" for nvidia, and "x970" is equal to "x80".

EDIT: Also, 7000 series aren't slow. I don't know what nvidia propaganda you've been choking on, but that's like saying that intel processors are bad for dolphin.
Find
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »


  • View a Printable Version
Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB | Theme by Fragma