i5 3570k 4.2GHz ~ i5 2500k @ 4.5GHz
Laptop:
Mini PC ::
Worth waiting for Haswell?
|
06-07-2013, 05:35 PM
i5 3570k 4.2GHz ~ i5 2500k @ 4.5GHz
Laptop: Mini PC :: 06-07-2013, 05:41 PM
Thanks, two years ago I wanted to buy a SB and overclok it to 4.5 GHz but now I will get the same results without overclocking hehe. Great =)
(06-07-2013, 05:41 PM)Tetris Wrote: Thanks, two years ago I wanted to buy a SB and overclok it to 4.5 GHz but now I will get the same results without overclocking hehe. Great =)???? i5-4670K=3400mhz i5-2500K=3400mhz the hz of cpu is absolutely the same in essence you would not have lost nothing special if u have bought sb before
My Rig:
Mainboard: Asus P8-Z77 | Ram: ExceleRam 2x8GB DDR3 Black Shark 1600MHz Cl9 | GFX: Nvidia GTX950 WFOC 2GB DDR5 CPU+Cooler: [color=#0000CD]Intel 2500K[/color] [color=#32CD32]@[/color] [color=#FF0000]4.6ghz[/color] + Xigmatek Gaia SD1283 (Push/Pull) 06-08-2013, 03:33 AM
(This post was last modified: 06-08-2013, 03:34 AM by Starscream.)
(06-08-2013, 02:21 AM)IcemanSR Wrote:(06-07-2013, 05:41 PM)Tetris Wrote: Thanks, two years ago I wanted to buy a SB and overclok it to 4.5 GHz but now I will get the same results without overclocking hehe. Great =)???? Iceman is right. This year Intel just released the 2500K again, they just renamed it 4670K for fun.
Asus Laptop: K53TA
OS: Windows 7 Home Premium, 64-Bit - SP1 CPU: AMD Llano A6-3400M, Quad-Core, 1.4GHz-2.6GHz (Overclocked) GPU: AMD Radeon HD6650M, 1GB GDDR3 (Catalyst 13.1) RAM: Samsung 4GB DDR3-1333 06-08-2013, 05:55 AM
Right because the same operating clock rate means the chip is the same.....
"Normally if given a choice between doing something and nothing, I’d choose to do nothing. But I would do something if it helps someone else do nothing. I’d work all night if it meant nothing got done."
-Ron Swanson "I shall be a good politician, even if it kills me. Or if it kills anyone else for that matter. " -Mark Antony 06-08-2013, 06:31 AM
Yeah....clock speed isn't the biggest factor in performance, I'd be willing to bet a 1.5GHz Ivy Bridge Core i3 would perform better than a Pentium D at 3GHz despite having halve the clock speed.
Ragnarok: i5 750 @ 3200MHz | Titan Fenrir | MSI P55-GD65 | 8GiB Corsair 1600MHz CAS9 | 1GiB HD6950 | Crucial M4 64GB | Samsung F3 500GB | Samsung F3 1TB | Seasonic X-750 | X-Fi XtremeGamer | HAF932 | Win7 Pro | LMDE
Sleipnir: Samsung Galaxy S II (CM10.1) Gungnir: Asus Nexus 7 (Stock) 06-08-2013, 06:38 AM
(06-08-2013, 06:31 AM)storm20200 Wrote: I'd be willing to bet a 1.5GHz Ivy Bridge Core i3 would perform better than a Pentium D at 3GHz despite having halve the clock speed. Both will suck with Dolphin anyway
[color=#ff0000][color=#006600]i5 3570K @ 4.5GHz/GTX 660 Ti/RAM 4GB/Win7 x64[/color][/color]
06-08-2013, 06:40 AM
storm20200 Wrote:I'd be willing to bet a 1.5GHz Ivy Bridge Core i3 would perform better than a Pentium D at 3GHz despite having halve the clock speed. For sure. A core 2 duo at 1.5 GHz would outperform a pentium D at 3 GHz. An ivy bridge core i2 at 1.5GHz would easily outperform a pentium D at 4.5GHz.
"Normally if given a choice between doing something and nothing, I’d choose to do nothing. But I would do something if it helps someone else do nothing. I’d work all night if it meant nothing got done."
-Ron Swanson "I shall be a good politician, even if it kills me. Or if it kills anyone else for that matter. " -Mark Antony 06-08-2013, 09:09 AM
omega_rugal Wrote:rebranding again? cheap bastards... He was likely kidding. It's a completely different microarchitecture.
"Normally if given a choice between doing something and nothing, I’d choose to do nothing. But I would do something if it helps someone else do nothing. I’d work all night if it meant nothing got done."
-Ron Swanson "I shall be a good politician, even if it kills me. Or if it kills anyone else for that matter. " -Mark Antony |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|