• Login
  • Register
  • Dolphin Forums
  • Home
  • FAQ
  • Download
  • Wiki
  • Code


Dolphin, the GameCube and Wii emulator - Forums › Offtopic › Delfino Plaza v
« Previous 1 ... 14 15 16 17 18 ... 64 Next »

Why is PCSX2's hardware renderer so far behind from the software renderer?
View New Posts | View Today's Posts

Pages (2): « Previous 1 2
Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thread Modes
Why is PCSX2's hardware renderer so far behind from the software renderer?
12-27-2014, 02:48 AM
#11
kinkinkijkin Offline
Human embodiment of the headache caused by a weird issue
****
Posts: 575
Threads: 12
Joined: May 2013
(12-26-2014, 02:52 PM)NaturalViolence Wrote: Why would you ask this question on the dolphin forums instead of the pcsx2 forums?

possibly the idea that, if the dolphin devs have it right, they probably know more about why they have it wrong and others don't than those who don't have it right?

Honestly, though, it could be posed to the pcsx2 forums, but I don't think it's entirely out of place here, personally.
in a perfect world we would all be piles of sand with no ability to form coherent bodies of body
Find
Reply
12-28-2014, 03:35 AM (This post was last modified: 12-28-2014, 03:42 AM by dogen.)
#12
dogen Offline
Junior Member
**
Posts: 25
Threads: 0
Joined: Jun 2014
(12-27-2014, 02:48 AM)kinkinkijkin Wrote:
(12-26-2014, 02:52 PM)NaturalViolence Wrote: Why would you ask this question on the dolphin forums instead of the pcsx2 forums?

possibly the idea that, if the dolphin devs have it right, they probably know more about why they have it wrong and others don't than those who don't have it right?

Honestly, though, it could be posed to the pcsx2 forums, but I don't think it's entirely out of place here, personally.

The pcsx2 team knows what's wrong with the harware renderer though. There's just nobody with enough time or know how to start working on a replacement. Gabest is planning on writing a new one that uses openCL 2.0 but last I heard his r9 270x didn't support it yet. He also said that that cuda would be doable as well, but his GTX 460 doesn't support a new enough version.
Find
Reply
12-28-2014, 10:25 AM
#13
RachelB Offline
Developer
*******
Moderators
Posts: 1,003
Threads: 1
Joined: Dec 2011
Basically just a matter of it being abandoned. The software renderer received more attention, and it's easier to get that right.
Find
Reply
12-28-2014, 11:39 AM
#14
dogen Offline
Junior Member
**
Posts: 25
Threads: 0
Joined: Jun 2014
(12-28-2014, 10:25 AM)RachelB Wrote: Basically just a matter of it being abandoned. The software renderer received more attention, and it's easier to get that right.

Well, it is easier to get right, but do we know that gabest spent more time on it?

Anyway, the devs have confirmed multiple times that as it is, GSdx isn't substantially improvable, and they would essentially need to rewrite it.
Find
Reply
12-29-2014, 10:12 AM (This post was last modified: 12-29-2014, 10:15 AM by Ramoth.)
#15
Ramoth Offline
Member
***
Posts: 141
Threads: 0
Joined: Jul 2014
(12-28-2014, 11:39 AM)dogen Wrote:
(12-28-2014, 10:25 AM)RachelB Wrote: Basically just a matter of it being abandoned. The software renderer received more attention, and it's easier to get that right.

Well, it is easier to get right, but do we know that gabest spent more time on it?

Anyway, the devs have confirmed multiple times that as it is, GSdx isn't substantially improvable, and they would essentially need to rewrite it.
Software is easier but GSDX software renderer also has incompatible games and bugs including bugs not present in hardware renderer. Would fixing them also require rewriting entire plugin ? You are right that not many people have know-how that is why help is needed otherwise it will never be rewritten.
Find
Reply
12-29-2014, 02:54 PM (This post was last modified: 12-29-2014, 02:55 PM by dogen.)
#16
dogen Offline
Junior Member
**
Posts: 25
Threads: 0
Joined: Jun 2014
(12-29-2014, 10:12 AM)Ramoth Wrote:
(12-28-2014, 11:39 AM)dogen Wrote:
(12-28-2014, 10:25 AM)RachelB Wrote: Basically just a matter of it being abandoned. The software renderer received more attention, and it's easier to get that right.

Well, it is easier to get right, but do we know that gabest spent more time on it?

Anyway, the devs have confirmed multiple times that as it is, GSdx isn't substantially improvable, and they would essentially need to rewrite it.
Software is easier but GSDX software renderer also has incompatible games and bugs including bugs not present in hardware renderer. Would fixing them also require rewriting entire plugin ? You are right that not many people have know-how that is why help is needed otherwise it will never be rewritten.

I don't know, but Gabest is going to write an openCL one. He's waiting for openCL 2.0 support for his 270X, or for when he can upgrade to a new geforce card for cuda support. He probably plans on supporting both eventually. I almost want to buy him a 750ti so he can get started.
Find
Reply
12-30-2014, 03:53 AM
#17
DatKid20 Offline
UDK/Cryengine3/Unity tinkererer
****
Posts: 516
Threads: 26
Joined: Jul 2013
Why would he be waiting? The driver is right here? http://support.amd.com/en-us/kb-articles/Pages/OpenCL2-Driver.aspx
Find
Reply
12-30-2014, 05:01 AM
#18
dogen Offline
Junior Member
**
Posts: 25
Threads: 0
Joined: Jun 2014
(12-30-2014, 03:53 AM)DatKid20 Wrote: Why would he be waiting? The driver is right here? http://support.amd.com/en-us/kb-articles/Pages/OpenCL2-Driver.aspx

Apparently his card still doesn't support it. Maybe he's not using windows 8.1 or ubuntu 14.04.

You can read what he said here.
http://forums.pcsx2.net/Thread-GSdx?page=464
Find
Reply
12-30-2014, 05:31 AM
#19
DatKid20 Offline
UDK/Cryengine3/Unity tinkererer
****
Posts: 516
Threads: 26
Joined: Jul 2013
It's not his card. It's his OS. His card is on the supported list.
Find
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
Pages (2): « Previous 1 2


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread
Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB | Theme by Fragma

Linear Mode
Threaded Mode