When in the world Intel will upload gma 965/x3100 up to opengl 2.1 or 2.3?

08-05-2010, 03:09 AM #1

I'm waiting since 2009 so they upload up opengl 2.1!

BTW: Who has good specs on an intle gma 965?

**DacoTaco** · (This post was last modified: 08-05-2010, 03:11 AM by DacoTaco.)

upload up?

lol, have you stood still to think the crap intel chipset can't handle more then it can right now?
the hardware & its users fail hard.

tl;dr : intel chipsets suck ass and not its drivers

Hero · 08-05-2010, 03:15 AM #3

(08-05-2010, 03:10 AM)Daco Wrote: upload up?

lol, have you stood still to think the crap intel chipset can't handle more then it can right now?
the hardware & its users fail hard.

tl;dr : intel chipsets suck ass and not its drivers

Uh, never? OpenGL 2.1 should already be on intel shitsets. OGL 3.3 is for dx10, and 4.0 is for dx11. (card referenced)Intel integrations are made for basic business and browsing only.

**DacoTaco** · 08-05-2010, 04:07 AM #4

(08-05-2010, 03:15 AM)Hero Wrote:
(08-05-2010, 03:10 AM)Daco Wrote: upload up?

lol, have you stood still to think the crap intel chipset can't handle more then it can right now?
the hardware & its users fail hard.

tl;dr : intel chipsets suck ass and not its drivers

Uh, never? OpenGL 2.1 should already be on intel shitsets. OGL 3.3 is for dx10, and 4.0 is for dx11. (card referenced)Intel integrations are made for basic business and browsing only.

and since when are intel chipsets graphic cards?

**NaturalViolence** · (This post was last modified: 08-05-2010, 04:46 AM by NaturalViolence.)

Quote:and since when are intel chipsets graphic cards?

They aren't, but they are graphics microprocessors just like what nvidia and ATI make. They are just used for a different purpose. They actually do have some major advantages over nvidia/ati chips. For example even the lowest end integrated ati/nvidia gpus have a much higher power consumption and produce far more thermal energy making them more difficult to use in "low end" and ultra-mobile equipment. If all you need to do with a system is word processing and web browsing they really are the most efficient solution, obviously if you want a full blown media center you might want to use something with a bit more punch.

I know you already know this daco but remember that a video card is nothing more than a circuit board with a microprocessor and memory, just like your core system.

Hero · 08-05-2010, 05:50 AM #6

(08-05-2010, 04:07 AM)Daco Wrote:
(08-05-2010, 03:15 AM)Hero Wrote:
(08-05-2010, 03:10 AM)Daco Wrote: upload up?

lol, have you stood still to think the crap intel chipset can't handle more then it can right now?
the hardware & its users fail hard.

tl;dr : intel chipsets suck ass and not its drivers

Uh, never? OpenGL 2.1 should already be on intel shitsets. OGL 3.3 is for dx10, and 4.0 is for dx11. (card referenced)Intel integrations are made for basic business and browsing only.
and since when are intel chipsets graphic cards?

I never said they were. But when it comes to OGL, dx10 gets 3.3 and dx11 gets 4.0.