The fact that Wii games look the way they do with HD at 60fps in Steroscopic 3D with other enhancements proves what about Nintendo?
What does it prove?
|
11-05-2015, 07:26 AM
Err... moved to Delfino Plaza
Avell A70 MOB: Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3060, 16 GB DDR4-3200, Windows 11 (Insider Preview)
ASRock Z97M OC Formula: Pentium G3258, GeForce GT 440, 16 GB DDR3-1600, Windows 10 (22H2) 11-05-2015, 09:13 AM
Proves their graphics artists cried in their sleep over the Wii?
Specs: intel i5 3570k @ 3.4GHz;
16Gb RAM; Raedon HD 7900; Win8 64-Bit 11-05-2015, 01:07 PM
11-05-2015, 01:35 PM
(This post was last modified: 11-05-2015, 01:41 PM by piccolo289.)
It proves that nintendo focuses on making timeless games without the most realistic art styles. Games that tried to have a realistic art style from around that same period have not aged nearly as well.
11-11-2015, 11:20 AM
![]() (11-05-2015, 01:35 PM)piccolo289 Wrote: Games that tried to have a realistic art style from around that same period have not aged nearly as well.If you do not mind me asking, specifically which games did you have in mind? I honestly cannot think of any games with what was at the time a "realistic art style" made by Nintendo that have aged poorly. 11-11-2015, 06:14 PM
(11-11-2015, 11:20 AM)Red Buzzy Beetle Wrote: If you do not mind me asking, specifically which games did you have in mind? I honestly cannot think of any games with what was at the time a "realistic art style" made by Nintendo that have aged poorly. I think the point was that companies other than Nintendo make games with more realistic art styles. 11-12-2015, 04:37 AM
11-12-2015, 04:57 AM
Nah I agree with what you said before. Nintendo games with realistic art styles haven't aged badly.
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)