(08-04-2009, 03:18 AM)tufask Wrote:1) on my old GF2 MX it didn't run fine at all at higest settings. on the contrary.(08-04-2009, 01:14 AM)Daco Wrote: @ tufask : my GF FX could run UT2k4 just fine. hell it can do Win7 full speed while Win7 is very hard on GPU's. what the fuck is your problem? no it can't do modern shit but for games which dont need shaders 2.0 it works perfect on XP
For UT2K4 the most important thing is a fast cpu, not a fast graphicscardI even could run it with an old GeForce 2 MX.
Win7 needs a fast gpu? Come on... as long as it's a DX9-card, it's ok to run Aero (even on Vista, which needs more ressources then Win7).
Sure you can play games that don't need SM 2.0... no wonder, most of them are 5 years old... Maybe 20 fps is fluid for you, but i prefer 30 fps at least
Anyways, this is getting offtopic. Just enjoy your Fx 5200 (which is still crap in my opinion)
2) wrong about vista<-> win7. Win7 needs less ram/cpu but ALOT more gpu then vista. and "just any DX9 card" isn't right. go use GF2 MX then if you will.
3) 30fps sure isn't fluid. im talking 60 fps here

4) who said im still using a GF5? GF6 & GF8 here
5) crap compared to what? a GF9? >_>


) 
![[Image: PeachSig.jpg]](http://www.dacotaco.com/PeachSig.jpg)
![[Image: 566286.png]](http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/banner/566286.png)
![[Image: 2280403.png]](http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/banner/2280403.png)