(04-11-2014, 12:09 AM)RachelB Wrote:(04-10-2014, 12:09 PM)rokclimb15 Wrote: I don't think you did necessarily. Mainly because I *hate* CCC and the buggy AMD drivers. AMD cards actually have a slight leg up in performance in recent dev versions. It's just a preference. I haven't owned an AMD card since they were owned by ATI (other than one early IGP that won't really game).
People actually use CCC? It's not needed at all.
As sad as this might sound I've been known to withold myself food whilst trying to find the best graphics/performance setting in a game through Radeon Pro, essentially an extension of CCC. It's like a curse you know, if there's a means to improve I don't let it go even if I'd be just as happy playing at 1xIR where everything is made out of stairs.
(04-11-2014, 12:21 AM)rokclimb15 Wrote:(04-11-2014, 12:09 AM)RachelB Wrote: People actually use CCC? It's not needed at all.
Wouldn't know. The last time I used it I got so dizzy I nearly threw up. I went out and bought a GTX 430 and haven't looked back.
It's not as bad as you're making it out to be. In fact some enhancements that wouldn't stick with NCP stuck with CCC.
4.0-1xxx
Win7 x64
i5-4670k @ 4.5Ghz
Sapphire Radeon r9 280x Toxic OC 3072Mb (ccc14.3 Beta)
8Gb 1866Mhz 9-10-9-27
Settings: https://i.imgur.com/zQIXz4l.png
Win7 x64
i5-4670k @ 4.5Ghz
Sapphire Radeon r9 280x Toxic OC 3072Mb (ccc14.3 Beta)
8Gb 1866Mhz 9-10-9-27
Settings: https://i.imgur.com/zQIXz4l.png