I don't think so for various reasons. To me a true RC of software should be near 100% complete with only bug fixes remaining. What do you think?
| Poll: Really should be "RC1"? This poll is closed. |
|||
| Yes it Should (Post Why) | 4 | 66.67% | |
| No it Should not. (Post Why) | 2 | 33.33% | |
| Total | 6 vote(s) | 100% | |
| * You voted for this item. | [Show Results] |
Thread Rating:
|
Should SVN 5167 REALLY be "RC 1"?
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Messages In This Thread |
|
Should SVN 5167 REALLY be "RC 1"? - Billmaster - 03-08-2010, 07:48 PM
RE: Should SVN 5167 REALLY be "RC 1"? - nosound97 - 03-08-2010, 08:54 PM
RE: Should SVN 5167 REALLY be "RC 1"? - omegadox - 03-08-2010, 08:57 PM
RE: Should SVN 5167 REALLY be "RC 1"? - Ocean - 03-09-2010, 12:56 AM
RE: Should SVN 5167 REALLY be "RC 1"? - GodRays - 03-09-2010, 02:17 AM
RE: Should SVN 5167 REALLY be "RC 1"? - Ocean - 03-09-2010, 02:25 AM
RE: Should SVN 5167 REALLY be "RC 1"? - shuffle2 - 03-09-2010, 02:27 AM
|
Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)
