• Login
  • Register
  • Dolphin Forums
  • Home
  • FAQ
  • Download
  • Wiki
  • Code


Dolphin, the GameCube and Wii emulator - Forums › Dolphin Emulator Discussion and Support › Hardware v
« Previous 1 ... 39 40 41 42 43 ... 188 Next »

Ryzen will run modern emulators as well - confirmed.
View New Posts | View Today's Posts

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thread Modes
Ryzen will run modern emulators as well - confirmed.
02-12-2017, 09:06 PM
#1
DarkHacker Offline
Member
***
Posts: 67
Threads: 11
Joined: Nov 2014
Finally, an AMD processor that run as well modern emulators.

http://wccftech.com/amd-ryzen-7-1700x-389-8-core-cpu-benchmarks-leaked/

Spoiler: (Show Spoiler)
[Image: AMD-Ryzen-7-1700X-CPU-Single-Threaded.jpg]
[Image: AMD-Ryzen-7-1700X-CPU-Integer-840x374.jpg]
[Image: AMD-Ryzen-7-1700X-CPU-Extended-Instructi...40x374.jpg]


Rolleyes
Desktop #1 CPU: [color=#cc3333]Ryzen 7 3700x @ 4.2Ghz[/color] - GPU: [color=#cc3333]RX 570 4gb[/color] OS:  [color=#993333]Windows 7 x64[/color]
-----------------------------------------------
Laptop #1 --- CPU: i5 3320M ------ GPU: 7570M --
Laptop #2[color=#339933] [color=#333333]---  [/color][/color][color=#339933]i5 4200U @ GT 740M[/color]
----------------------------------------
HTPC @ EmulationBox
---------------------------

Waiting for Ryzen 2200G... Heart Angel




Find
Reply
02-12-2017, 09:18 PM (This post was last modified: 02-12-2017, 09:23 PM by admin89.)
#2
admin89 Offline
Overclocker™ ✓ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ
*******
Posts: 6,889
Threads: 127
Joined: Nov 2009
Not until I see Dolphin Benchmark . Just to keep in mind that Ivy Bridge is 30% slower than Haswell in Dolphin
In real life , haswell is not that fast , only 5->6% better than Ivy Bridge
AMD FX series also did well on other benchmarks but when it comes to emulator like Dolphin , you never know...
I would wait for Anandtech review , as they always do Dolphin Benchmark
For Example , they did it on i7 7700k
http://www.anandtech.com/show/10968/the-intel-core-i7-7700k-91w-review-the-new-stock-performance-champion/3
Just to be clear , most modern AMD CPUs are good enough for Dolphin if you overclock them . I tried Dolphin on A10 6790k @ 5.0GHz , most games run well , even demanding games like TLS (though I do have some slowdown)
As long as AMD keep their promise , their CPU should be able to run most games well
Laptop: (Show Spoiler)
Clevo W230SS : 3200x1800 IPS | i7 4700MQ @ 3.6GHz (Intel XTU + Triple fan mod) | GTX 860M GDDR5 | 128GB Toshiba CFD SSD | 16GB DDR3L 1600MHz
Aspire 715 43G : 1080p 144Hz |  R5 5625U @ 4.3GHz | Nvidia RTX 3050 4GB | 500GB WD SSD  | 16GB DDR4 3200MHz 
Mini PC :: (Show Spoiler)
G3258 @ 4.6GHz | ELSA GTX 750 | Asrock Z87E ITX | 600W SFX 80+ Gold Silverstone + SG06-LITE | Corsair Vengeance 8GB 2000MHz | Scythe Kozuti + Ao Kaze | 45TB 2.5" Ex HDD (in total) , Zelda Gold Wiimote , LE Wii Classic Controller , Gold LE PS3 DualShock , BlackWidow Chroma ,
Now Playing : Xenoblade Definitive Edition on Yuzu - Switch Emu 

 
Find
Reply
02-12-2017, 09:29 PM
#3
DarkHacker Offline
Member
***
Posts: 67
Threads: 11
Joined: Nov 2014
I understand, but the benchmark already shows that the IPC gains are real, and very expressive. STP is the most important when it comes to emulators, isn't it?

With pcsx2, at least, that's the way ...
Desktop #1 CPU: [color=#cc3333]Ryzen 7 3700x @ 4.2Ghz[/color] - GPU: [color=#cc3333]RX 570 4gb[/color] OS:  [color=#993333]Windows 7 x64[/color]
-----------------------------------------------
Laptop #1 --- CPU: i5 3320M ------ GPU: 7570M --
Laptop #2[color=#339933] [color=#333333]---  [/color][/color][color=#339933]i5 4200U @ GT 740M[/color]
----------------------------------------
HTPC @ EmulationBox
---------------------------

Waiting for Ryzen 2200G... Heart Angel




Find
Reply
02-13-2017, 06:18 AM
#4
Helios Offline
Stellaaaaaaa
**********
Developers (Some Administrators and Super Moderators)
Posts: 4,395
Threads: 15
Joined: May 2012
Are there other benches besides CPU mark? Synthetic is meh.
Find
Reply
02-15-2017, 11:47 PM
#5
NaturalViolence Offline
It's not that I hate people, I just hate stupid people
*******
Posts: 9,013
Threads: 24
Joined: Oct 2009
This isn't "confirmed" or even about modern emulators. This thread title is extremely misleading.

I do however think that those results are PROBABLY what we can expect. Good multithreaded performance but singlethreaded performance still lagging behind Intel. Which means emulators will likely continue to run better on Intel setups.
"Normally if given a choice between doing something and nothing, I’d choose to do nothing. But I would do something if it helps someone else do nothing. I’d work all night if it meant nothing got done."  
-Ron Swanson

"I shall be a good politician, even if it kills me. Or if it kills anyone else for that matter. "
-Mark Antony
Website Find
Reply
02-16-2017, 12:27 AM
#6
DarkHacker Offline
Member
***
Posts: 67
Threads: 11
Joined: Nov 2014
(02-15-2017, 11:47 PM)NaturalViolence Wrote: This isn't "confirmed" or even about modern emulators.  This thread title is extremely misleading.

I do however think that those results are PROBABLY what we can expect.  Good multithreaded performance but singlethreaded performance still lagging behind Intel.  Which means emulators will likely continue to run better on Intel setups.

Yeah... It makes perfect sense.



"Regardless of the fact that the engineering sample we’re looking at may be only running at 3.4Ghz without Turbo, the result would remain just as impressive even if it was hitting its intended Turbo clock speed of 3.8GHz. It manages to successfully edge out the 5960X and the 6800K and falls behind the 6900K by no more than 3%. That’s a very impressive feat considering Intel’s i7-6900K and i7-6800K both turbo up to 4Ghz and 3.8Ghz respectively in single threaded mode thanks to Broadwell-E’s Turbo Boost 3.0 feature. This means that even if the Ryzen engineering sample was in fact running at 3.8GHz Turbo frequency, it would still be outperforming Broadwell-E clock for clock ever so slightly."
Desktop #1 CPU: [color=#cc3333]Ryzen 7 3700x @ 4.2Ghz[/color] - GPU: [color=#cc3333]RX 570 4gb[/color] OS:  [color=#993333]Windows 7 x64[/color]
-----------------------------------------------
Laptop #1 --- CPU: i5 3320M ------ GPU: 7570M --
Laptop #2[color=#339933] [color=#333333]---  [/color][/color][color=#339933]i5 4200U @ GT 740M[/color]
----------------------------------------
HTPC @ EmulationBox
---------------------------

Waiting for Ryzen 2200G... Heart Angel




Find
Reply
02-17-2017, 11:16 PM (This post was last modified: 02-17-2017, 11:17 PM by DarkHacker.)
#7
DarkHacker Offline
Member
***
Posts: 67
Threads: 11
Joined: Nov 2014
More Benchs 1600x:

Spoiler: (Show Spoiler)
[Image: amd-ryzen-5-1600x-cpu-z-benchmark-3.jpg]
[Image: amd-ryzen-5-1600x-cpu-z-benchmark-1.jpg]

Intel:

Spoiler: (Show Spoiler)
[Image: MsyLC4B.png]
[Image: nGtnusY.png]


http://wccftech.com/amd-ryzen-5-1600x-cpu-benchmark-leak/
Desktop #1 CPU: [color=#cc3333]Ryzen 7 3700x @ 4.2Ghz[/color] - GPU: [color=#cc3333]RX 570 4gb[/color] OS:  [color=#993333]Windows 7 x64[/color]
-----------------------------------------------
Laptop #1 --- CPU: i5 3320M ------ GPU: 7570M --
Laptop #2[color=#339933] [color=#333333]---  [/color][/color][color=#339933]i5 4200U @ GT 740M[/color]
----------------------------------------
HTPC @ EmulationBox
---------------------------

Waiting for Ryzen 2200G... Heart Angel




Find
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread
Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB | Theme by Fragma

Linear Mode
Threaded Mode