Ryzen 1700X Stock vs Dolphin Benchmark.
|
03-03-2017, 01:45 PM
So how cool does it run ? What is the stock voltage , 1.36V ? Can you undervolt it while keeping it at 4.0GHz ? (Or at least 3.7GHz)
I hope I can see 65W R7 1700 in notebook formfactor soon Laptop: Mini PC :: 03-03-2017, 01:47 PM
(03-03-2017, 01:22 PM)Gregtastic Wrote: I would agree with this sentiment. Turbo is apparently 3.7 GHz yet when running the benchmark it never went over 3.12. 3.8 GHz 1.25 Voltage. OK.....so I pre-ordered a 1700X and an 1800X at Microcenter, just to keep my place in line in case supply/demand was actually crazy. It wasn't. I planned on reading/watching reviews in the morning before I went and picked up the CPU. I was kind of tempted to get the 1700 from the start because it seemed like they are all the same chip....I mean obviously Intel/AMD/Nvidia practice binning....but it seemed like 1700-1800X are the same just with things enabled/disabled out the factory........but I am no expert so I look at the better CPUs lol......anyway.....wake up in the morning.....read/watch reviews......see 1700 overclocked is performing the same as 1800X say F those pre-orders I'll pick up a 1700 if they have it.....they did. Anyway....overall......performance is as expected. The leaks and numbers were nice but did anyone expect a 1st gen Zen chip to match Kabby Lake? Come on....especially as a 1st gen 8/16 core chip vs a refined 4/8 core chip. AMD is going for a market that doesn't exist until today. You can compare it to Intel's 8 core chips and show they do better but its double the price.... It will be interesting when the other CPUs come out....I'm kind of confused by them. The 6/12 chip is 3.6/4.0 GHz yet the 4/8 is a lower clock?? I don't know lol. Anyway.....AMD obviously isn't equal or better to Intel but it helps that they are now an OPTION. These 8/16 chips weren't going to compete with 4/8 i7's....that just doesn't make sense. I still have my 6600K. I always have 2 PC's so I may replace my 3470 hooked up to my TV with the 6600K and use the 1700 in my desktop PC where I do more of my "Workstation" work haha. But overall I'm pretty happy. If I had bought an 1800X I'd be pissed. But having bought a 1700 which overclock similarly to the other chips I'm very happy. I still have the stock cooler on it too. I don't know why I'm explaining so much.....I just feel like people had no clue what they were expecting. I was intrigued because I may want to encode, stream and game at the same time. I STILL think Ryzen will excel at this vs an i7. But for people who JUST want to game R7 should have never been an option. They should have been waiting to see how R3/R5 compete with i5/i7 from the start. And I still think i3/Pentium are meeting some type of death and or merger lol. 03-03-2017, 01:54 PM
(03-03-2017, 01:45 PM)admin89 Wrote: So how cool does it run ? What is the stock voltage , 1.36V ? Can you undervolt it while keeping it at 4.0GHz ? (Or at least 3.7GHz) Hey man....I just posted that long post without seeing this post here. I have it at 1.25V and 3.8 GHz right now. I have little experience overclocking, but the AMD software makes it pretty easy. It's been 36°-43°C depending on load for the most part. I might play around with it more tonight. Without being a hardware expert myself I see 1.3V and 4.0 GHz as the ceiling. Again, I'm not a hardware expert but when I did the 3.7 GHz setting earlier in the thread I didn't mess with the voltage so it was like 1.12V I think. I'm willing to mess around and try stuff out if anyone wants.....just give me suggestions.....because, like I said I'm no expert. The AMD software makes it easier than using the BIOS and I am going based on what reviewers are saying about clock speeds and voltage. That being said though, I think the 1700 will be the winner out of these three chips. If I bought a 1700X or 1800X and then saw the reviews of 1700 CPUs matching them overclocking with less wattage I'd be pisssed. Especially since some of the bigger sites only reviewed the 1800X and will be working their way down to the 1700. 03-03-2017, 02:07 PM
1.25V is very impressive . I never thought AMD would be able to break 1.3V barrier
Look like my next laptop will be 2nd Gen AMD Ryzen (Intel Coffee Lake , Tiger Lake will probably be 0-10% better than Kabylake anyway) Laptop: Mini PC :: 03-03-2017, 02:14 PM
(03-03-2017, 02:07 PM)admin89 Wrote: 1.25V is very impressive . I never thought AMD would be able to break 1.3V barrier I'm REALLY interested in what AMD ends up offering as APU's. I imagine Intel will have a CPU lead for quite a few years even if AMD does it's best to catch up, but it will interesting to see what they can do with the GPU and CPU together. For me it is always fun to root for the underdog and competition is good! 03-03-2017, 04:22 PM
(This post was last modified: 03-03-2017, 04:40 PM by Nintendo Maniac 64.)
Have you tried Ryzen in the old Dolphin benchmarks?
https://forums.dolphin-emu.org/Thread-ne...e-required https://forums.dolphin-emu.org/Thread-th...-benchmark It'd be interesting to see if the less-than-Haswell performance still holds, or if Ryzen is falling susceptible to the same weird luabench issue where Sandy Bridge is slower per-GHz than Conroe.
Dolphin 5.0 CPU benchmark
CPU: Xeon E3-1246 v3 (4c/8t Haswell/Intel 4th gen) — core & cache @ 3.9GHz via multicore enhancement GPU: Intel integrated HD Graphics P4600 RAM: 4x8GB Corsair Vengence @ DDR3-1600 OS: Linux Mint 20.3 Xfce + [VM] Win7 SP1 x64 03-03-2017, 04:39 PM
(03-03-2017, 04:22 PM)Nintendo Maniac 64 Wrote: Have you tried Ryzen in the old Dolphin benchmarks? I'm up and I still have a few beers left so I'll try it now! 03-03-2017, 05:00 PM
(03-03-2017, 04:22 PM)Nintendo Maniac 64 Wrote: Have you tried Ryzen in the old Dolphin benchmarks? Honestly too lazy to do the second test tonight.... but first test 10 Minutes 36 Seconds That is at 3.8 GHz. 03-03-2017, 05:06 PM
(This post was last modified: 03-03-2017, 05:08 PM by Nintendo Maniac 64.)
(03-03-2017, 05:00 PM)Gregtastic Wrote: Honestly too lazy to do the second test tonight.... Well it might not be necessary because that result is in-line with the "slower than Haswell" result of luabench, and puts it just a bit faster per-clock than Ivy Bridge. So now the question is, when will https://dolphin-emu.org/docs/faq/#which-...ould-i-use be updated? The FX8000 series is no longer the best that AMD has.
Dolphin 5.0 CPU benchmark
CPU: Xeon E3-1246 v3 (4c/8t Haswell/Intel 4th gen) — core & cache @ 3.9GHz via multicore enhancement GPU: Intel integrated HD Graphics P4600 RAM: 4x8GB Corsair Vengence @ DDR3-1600 OS: Linux Mint 20.3 Xfce + [VM] Win7 SP1 x64 |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)