Revs and Builds

[Jefferson]

I saw some comments on some REVs changelog, posting unnecesary things. I dont get why some people write unnecesary things on some REVs changelogs.

[Johnblunt]

But Seriously it would be good if there was an recommandation of the month that was hosted contantly during that month and that people could comment on like this game is now working and this game is now boken and so on.
So thet even if there is the techinical aspect of it and i would not dream of asking the devs to write this for dummies versions, but let us the dummies fo it
I think that someone looking for an emulator for the first time is not going to review the dev logs. So I think this would be a good option.

---

Sorry, flunk the last one i kind of guess thats what the snapshot is about. Its just that for example the few first verions of 5000+ was kind of bummer..
Now its getting pretty peachy again, but i think that a newbie wouldent know.

[Jack Frost]

(02-22-2010, 12:47 PM)Ocean Wrote: Look:
Revision 5057 changelog

The comments or thread are not really helping to make new revision (especially for automatic compilers such as Mamario).

I don't know if admins ever delete stuff from there, but that problem is not so widespread anymore.

For the record, the commit message reads about "NAH!", "DUH!" or "NO WAY!"; and it fixes a memory leak.


A Note for +/-: few people really know what it means to rate a revision positive or negative, and that leads to revisions with +90/-12, where nobody ever knows what the hell happened.
If you read this, check the revision, understand and test what the commit message says and confirm it improves things: feel free to +1.
It majorly breaks a feature, or does not do what the message says: -1 it.
You dont understand the commit message, havent tested it, or just want to add a general comment: no rating, neutral, or dont even post.
Bug report, unrelated stuff thats broken: raise an Issue.