So apparently if you delete a post it still counts towards your daily post count (yes I'm still the highest poster today without testing that ).
Random
|
08-21-2015, 09:29 AM
(08-21-2015, 08:39 AM)ExtremeDude2 Wrote: So apparently if you delete a post it still counts towards your daily post count (yes I'm still the highest poster today without testing that ). Delete posts? Normal users can't do that, it's a "soft" delete, mods and admins will still see them: It's a MyBB feature, that's why your daily post count didn't decrease. I also didn't test but your daily post count would probably decrease if a mod or admin deleted that post permanently... Spoiler:
Avell A70 MOB: Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3060, 32 GB DDR4-3200, Windows 11 (Insider Preview)
ASRock Z97M OC Formula: Pentium G3258, GeForce GT 440, 16 GB DDR3-1600, Windows 10 (22H2) 08-21-2015, 09:31 AM
(This post was last modified: 08-21-2015, 09:31 AM by ExtremeDude2.)
08-21-2015, 12:43 PM
08-21-2015, 01:50 PM
Nah, I was just kidding, I'm not that paranoid to go seeking all deleted posts of someone just to see if he/she stated something that breaks our forum rules. But that feature was really useful once, an user (don't remember who) opened a new thread asking for help, clearly stating that the game was downloaded. Someone reported him/her but also posted saying that it's against the rules, the user thanked him and deleted the post. When I saw the report I could see the deleted post so I just quoted it and banned the user for 2 weeks, as usual.
About edit history, no, we can't see that, at least I can't (but I'm just a mod, don't know if super mods or admins can do that, it's beyond my knowledge)...
Avell A70 MOB: Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3060, 32 GB DDR4-3200, Windows 11 (Insider Preview)
ASRock Z97M OC Formula: Pentium G3258, GeForce GT 440, 16 GB DDR3-1600, Windows 10 (22H2) 08-21-2015, 02:02 PM
No, there is no such thing as edit history, even for admins. That would be creepy
08-21-2015, 03:56 PM
When talking about percentage changes, people often use "FOO is 50% more than BAR" or "FOO is 50% more popular than BAR". This is correct usage.
When talking about percentage ratios, the correct term to use is "FOO is 300% as much as BAR", "FOO is 300% of BAR", or "FOO is 300% as popular as BAR". However, many people mistakenly say "FOO is 300% more popular than BAR". Literally interpreted, that sentence means that FOO = 4*BAR. Those people intend to say that "FOO is 300% as popular as BAR", or FOO = 3*BAR. Percentages below 100% are usually used correctly, but I observe more frequent errors with percentages above 100%, more often when it's several times 100. Using "more" as a multiplier is ubiquitous but logically incorrect. Is it acceptable in current English, and is it frequently misunderstood by readers? Am I correct that the correct multiplier words are "as" and "of"? (xpost http://english.stackexchange.com/q/268225/134773) 08-21-2015, 04:25 PM
(08-21-2015, 02:02 PM)Shonumi Wrote: No, there is no such thing as edit history, even for admins. That would be creepy I don't think that would be creepy at all, honestly, and it would help us catch people who edit their posts to avoid punishment. But of course I work on the wiki a lot where every edit ever is recorded forever and publicly viewable, so... Intel Xeon w7-3465X OC | Asus Pro WS W790-E Sage SE | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 FE | 8x16GiB G-Skill Zeta R5 DDR5-6000 | Windows 11 23H2 | (details)
MacBook Pro 14in | M1 Max (32 GPU Cores) | 64GB LPDDR5 6400 | macOS 13
08-21-2015, 05:49 PM
(08-21-2015, 04:25 PM)MaJoR Wrote:(08-21-2015, 02:02 PM)Shonumi Wrote: No, there is no such thing as edit history, even for admins. That would be creepy i agree with major here. not creepy at all 08-22-2015, 12:32 AM
What? Have you guys honestly never posted something that sounded completely stupid, then edited it? I see it happen plenty of times to others. Editing isn't just for typos you know
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 28 Guest(s)