I don't think any of your plans will work out because there simply isn't enough manpower to regulate something like this. Besides, everyone's definition of what problems are serious are different. Lots of people will play a game despite what I'd consider critical, game breaking bugs, where as some people think some of the bugs I don't mind are these horrible things.
I'm not sure what else you want to do, but, just looking over that was pretty worrying. Standardization across the entire wiki would be impossible considering there are pages years old already. When I play a game and update the wiki, I don't want to worry about following some complex template, I want to write down what I did, put down a rating for the game if I'm confident I played enough, and note any bugs. The more complex you make it the less likely I am to contribute. I do not like the added complexity.
I do agree there are things the wiki could do better, sure, but I'm not convinced this is the right way to go about it yet.
I'm not sure what else you want to do, but, just looking over that was pretty worrying. Standardization across the entire wiki would be impossible considering there are pages years old already. When I play a game and update the wiki, I don't want to worry about following some complex template, I want to write down what I did, put down a rating for the game if I'm confident I played enough, and note any bugs. The more complex you make it the less likely I am to contribute. I do not like the added complexity.
I do agree there are things the wiki could do better, sure, but I'm not convinced this is the right way to go about it yet.
