Post your experience index.

[Maverick Hunter X]

Ladies and gentlemen!

I here by give you the proof that WinSAT fails and sucks!
I've marked the failures.

[mbc07]

Well, probably Microsoft forgot to update WinSAT when ported it from Windows Vista...

[Maverick Hunter X]

(09-22-2011, 05:41 AM)Jhonn Wrote: Well, probably Microsoft forgot to update WinSAT when ported it from Windows Vista...

I would not be surprised at all if they did a thing like that because I seem not to be the only one with this humiliating error/glitch showing DX10 with Windows 7 and an DX11 Card in WinSAT.

Windows 7 = DX11 & ATi Radeon HD6900 series = DX11 Card = DX10 + WinSAT sucks = my math rocks!

And on top of it I recently bought this Kingston 30GB SSD Drive and as the picture show I can't even get it higher then my old mechanical 250GB HDD which also was a 5.9
My SSD Drive is a lot faster then that mechanical piece of metal and it's great for just having the OS on.
That's why I don't trust WinSAT and that's why I'm never gonna use it again for that matter.

[DacoTaco]

(09-22-2011, 03:46 PM)Maverick Hunter X Wrote: And on top of it I recently bought this Kingston 30GB SSD Drive and as the picture show I can't even get it higher then my old mechanical 250GB HDD which also was a 5.9
My SSD Drive is a lot faster then that mechanical piece of metal and it's great for just having the OS on.

low capacity = low number. just live with it

[Lucario]

^ Correct

I have 128GB SSD and one day I created 10gb partition for temporary windows 7, WinSAT says SSD's a 5.9. Meanwhile WinSAT on bigger partition said SSD's a 7.3.

[Maverick Hunter X]

(09-22-2011, 04:00 PM)DacoTaco Wrote:

(09-22-2011, 03:46 PM)Maverick Hunter X Wrote: And on top of it I recently bought this Kingston 30GB SSD Drive and as the picture show I can't even get it higher then my old mechanical 250GB HDD which also was a 5.9
My SSD Drive is a lot faster then that mechanical piece of metal and it's great for just having the OS on.

low capacity = low number. just live with it

Yeah you're so right Daco!
I'm gonna live with it and it works perfect.

30GB for just an OS is well then enough and an other HDD as storage.

[Lucario]

I alway thought large capacity ssd is better for OS + many softwares

[Maverick Hunter X]

(09-23-2011, 06:14 AM)Lucario Wrote: I alway thought large capacity ssd is better for OS + many softwares

Not really, it's not the size that's matter it's what you do with it.

I use my rig explicit as an emulation box and nothing else.
The OS + various updates like DirectX, Microsoft Visual C++ 2005, 2008 and 2010, .Net Framework 4, drivers and the emulators is all enough on 30GB

The games is on the mechanical 250GB HDD.

[Zee530]

Guess the number and win a prize

[LordVador]

2.5 for GPU. It should be the lowest