Ladies and gentlemen!
I here by give you the proof that WinSAT fails and sucks!
I've marked the failures.
I here by give you the proof that WinSAT fails and sucks!
I've marked the failures.
Post your experience index.
|
09-21-2011, 09:51 PM
Ladies and gentlemen!
I here by give you the proof that WinSAT fails and sucks! I've marked the failures. 09-22-2011, 05:41 AM
Well, probably Microsoft forgot to update WinSAT when ported it from Windows Vista...
Avell A70 MOB: Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3060, 32 GB DDR4-3200, Windows 11 (Insider Preview)
ASRock Z97M OC Formula: Pentium G3258, GeForce GT 440, 16 GB DDR3-1600, Windows 10 (22H2) 09-22-2011, 03:46 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-22-2011, 03:48 PM by Maverick Hunter X.)
(09-22-2011, 05:41 AM)Jhonn Wrote: Well, probably Microsoft forgot to update WinSAT when ported it from Windows Vista... I would not be surprised at all if they did a thing like that because I seem not to be the only one with this humiliating error/glitch showing DX10 with Windows 7 and an DX11 Card in WinSAT. Windows 7 = DX11 & ATi Radeon HD6900 series = DX11 Card = DX10 + WinSAT sucks = my math rocks! And on top of it I recently bought this Kingston 30GB SSD Drive and as the picture show I can't even get it higher then my old mechanical 250GB HDD which also was a 5.9 My SSD Drive is a lot faster then that mechanical piece of metal and it's great for just having the OS on. That's why I don't trust WinSAT and that's why I'm never gonna use it again for that matter. 09-22-2011, 04:00 PM
(09-22-2011, 03:46 PM)Maverick Hunter X Wrote: And on top of it I recently bought this Kingston 30GB SSD Drive and as the picture show I can't even get it higher then my old mechanical 250GB HDD which also was a 5.9low capacity = low number. just live with it
^ Correct
I have 128GB SSD and one day I created 10gb partition for temporary windows 7, WinSAT says SSD's a 5.9. Meanwhile WinSAT on bigger partition said SSD's a 7.3.
Prime [color=#2299FF]Z270[/color]-A :: [color=teal]7700k[/color] [color=#33CC33]@4.9Ghz[/color] :: Nvidia RTX [color=#33CC33]2060[/color]
09-22-2011, 08:07 PM
(09-22-2011, 04:00 PM)DacoTaco Wrote:(09-22-2011, 03:46 PM)Maverick Hunter X Wrote: And on top of it I recently bought this Kingston 30GB SSD Drive and as the picture show I can't even get it higher then my old mechanical 250GB HDD which also was a 5.9low capacity = low number. just live with it Yeah you're so right Daco! I'm gonna live with it and it works perfect. 30GB for just an OS is well then enough and an other HDD as storage. 09-23-2011, 06:14 AM
I alway thought large capacity ssd is better for OS + many softwares
Prime [color=#2299FF]Z270[/color]-A :: [color=teal]7700k[/color] [color=#33CC33]@4.9Ghz[/color] :: Nvidia RTX [color=#33CC33]2060[/color]
09-23-2011, 04:23 PM
(09-23-2011, 06:14 AM)Lucario Wrote: I alway thought large capacity ssd is better for OS + many softwares Not really, it's not the size that's matter it's what you do with it. I use my rig explicit as an emulation box and nothing else. The OS + various updates like DirectX, Microsoft Visual C++ 2005, 2008 and 2010, .Net Framework 4, drivers and the emulators is all enough on 30GB The games is on the mechanical 250GB HDD. 12-19-2011, 12:48 AM
2.5 for GPU. It should be the lowest
[color=#ff0000][color=#006600]i5 3570K @ 4.5GHz/GTX 660 Ti/RAM 4GB/Win7 x64[/color][/color]
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|