Hi guys, a couple of minutes ago i was reading a thread that says that the dx plugin its faster than the opengl plugin, well, this is not my case,
I run XP-SP3 and Win7 Ultimate both 32 bits, my dolphin SVN its r5460 with SSE41 32bits, and the opengl plugin it's 25-50% ( maybe more ) faster than the dx9 plugin, tried almost every possible config but dx always stays under opengl in performance, what about this? a new build might help me?
To explain my scenario my video config is a x800xl ati radeon and my drivers version are 9.1 ( I can't update them because my card it's old and not supported in new drivers updates ). I used to be using the 9.3_1 legacy drivers, however I must test this version of drivers tonight to see what happens, The SVN version that I'm using right now depends of d3d9_42.dll but "darkshadw" help me to get SVN 5842 which uses d3d9_43.dll ( other runtime that I didn't have), my questions are, with the d3d9_43.dll runtime I get more speed in DX9 plugin vs opengl? why my opengl plugin it's more fast?
LeaL
I run XP-SP3 and Win7 Ultimate both 32 bits, my dolphin SVN its r5460 with SSE41 32bits, and the opengl plugin it's 25-50% ( maybe more ) faster than the dx9 plugin, tried almost every possible config but dx always stays under opengl in performance, what about this? a new build might help me?
To explain my scenario my video config is a x800xl ati radeon and my drivers version are 9.1 ( I can't update them because my card it's old and not supported in new drivers updates ). I used to be using the 9.3_1 legacy drivers, however I must test this version of drivers tonight to see what happens, The SVN version that I'm using right now depends of d3d9_42.dll but "darkshadw" help me to get SVN 5842 which uses d3d9_43.dll ( other runtime that I didn't have), my questions are, with the d3d9_43.dll runtime I get more speed in DX9 plugin vs opengl? why my opengl plugin it's more fast?
LeaL