I'm deleting posts related to that change. The point of that benchmark is not to try to optimize the benchmark but to compare performance on the exact same program between several CPUs. If you want to discuss optimizing an old version of a stupid raytracer benchmark to improve your times, great, that's completely useless but feel free to use your time however you want.
Thread Rating:
|
New Dolphin CPU Benchmark - NO GAME REQUIRED
|
|
01-19-2014, 12:53 AM
CPU: i7-4700MQ @ 2.4GHz Turboboost: 3.5GHz, from Intel XTU
OS: Windows 8.1 Time: 9 minutes, 5 seconds Screenshot: http://imgur.com/71UgJlG Also CPU: AMD FX-8120 @ 3.1GHz, 4.2 GHz OC OS: Windows 8.1 Time: 15 minutes, 0 seconds Screenshot: http://imgur.com/lVQZPbD
Pushing my computer a tiny bit more every time...
CPU: Core i5 3570K (3.4 GHz) OC'd to 4.4 GHz OS: Windows 7 x64 Time: 9 minutes, 29 seconds Screenshot: http://i.imgur.com/hxiyybK.png Edit: Stock fan is proving to be a beast CPU: Core i5 3570K (3.4 GHz) OC'd to 4.6 GHz OS: Windows 7 x64 Time: 9 minutes, 2 seconds Screenshot: http://i.imgur.com/saaF26J.png
CPU: i5-3320M 3.10GHz
OS: linux 3.12.7-2-ARCH Time: 13:53 Screenshot: http://imgur.com/ud9btIh Edit: changed cpu clock as I've failed at cpu monitoring 01-19-2014, 02:41 AM
CPU: Intel Core i7 4770K OC; 4300MHz (43x100)
OS: Windows 7 Ultimate (x64) Time: 6 minutes, 59 seconds (419 seconds) Screenshot: http://i.imgur.com/7f8K4xD.png 01-19-2014, 03:14 AM
I got an AMD tester on board.
CPU: AMD Athlon X4 750K @ 3.4 GHz OS: Windows 7 x64 Time: 18 minutes, 26 seconds Screenshot: http://i.imgur.com/9AVPl9v.png
If I'm not mistaken, most motherboards by default will simply match the CPU cache ratio to the CPU core ratio. The main reason to adjust the value is to set it lower so that you can achieve a higher core ratio. Nonetheless, I forcibly set my CPU cache ratio to 44 to match my core. The results weren't particularly exciting (well within the margin of error).
CPU: Intel Core i7-4770K @4.4GHz OS: Windows 8.1 Professional x64 Time: 6 minutes, 51 seconds (411 seconds) Screenshot: http://i.imgur.com/wRi8G6J.png Someone could adjust their cache ratio to various values to see what difference it makes in this benchmark, although it probably wouldn't be terribly useful. Setting the cache ratio above the core ratio would likely provide little to no performance benefit, and setting it lower would only be helpful to the small subset of people that actually care about lowering their cache ratio to maximize an overclock. 01-19-2014, 04:08 AM
CPU: i7-3960X @ 4.0 GHz all threads
Memory: 16GB DDR3-1866 9-10-9 OS: Windows 7 64-bit Time: 11m 54 Screenshot: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/49768099/Dolphin%20Benchmark%203960X%204G.png Latest Kaveri results incoming... 01-19-2014, 04:34 AM
More people.
CPU: Core i3 3220 @ 3.3 GHz OS: Windows 7 Time: 14 minutes, 27 seconds Screenshot: http://i.imgur.com/h3BgsKV.png 01-19-2014, 04:43 AM
CPU: i7-2600K CPU @ 3.40GHz (No OC, no turbo)
OS: Linux Time: 12 minutes 28 seconds Screenshot: http://i.imgur.com/plRpxMx.png |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


