Yeah, that CPU is likely only to have performance comparable to an old dual-core Athlon or a Core 2 Duo; you could run the Dolphin 5.0 benchmark to see how it truly stacks up.
Regarding graphics, it's extremely likely that it's running Intel integrated graphics which aren't terrible, but certainly is only going to provide 1x to 2x internal resolution.
As an example, a 15" HP x360 Envy also costs around that price but most of that money goes into the processor only － it's not small, the screen is pretty bad, it doesn't have an SSD, the battery life isn't great at all regardless of processor.
Regarding graphics, it's extremely likely that it's running Intel integrated graphics which aren't terrible, but certainly is only going to provide 1x to 2x internal resolution.
(02-27-2018, 08:45 AM)Rotan Wrote: My brother bought this computer and I think it cost 600-800 was that a rip off (its almost a year old)For the price and performance, much of that cost likely went into everything other than the CPU, such as a small form-factor, battery, screen, and perhaps an SSD.
As an example, a 15" HP x360 Envy also costs around that price but most of that money goes into the processor only － it's not small, the screen is pretty bad, it doesn't have an SSD, the battery life isn't great at all regardless of processor.
Dolphin 5.0 CPU benchmark
CPU: Pentium G3258 @ 4.5GHz 1.24v
GPU: Intel integrated
RAM: 4x4GB Corsair Vengence @ DDR3-1600
OS: Linux Mint of some variety + [VM] Win7 SP1 x64
CPU: Pentium G3258 @ 4.5GHz 1.24v
GPU: Intel integrated
RAM: 4x4GB Corsair Vengence @ DDR3-1600
OS: Linux Mint of some variety + [VM] Win7 SP1 x64