• Login
  • Register
  • Dolphin Forums
  • Home
  • FAQ
  • Download
  • Wiki
  • Code


Dolphin, the GameCube and Wii emulator - Forums › Dolphin Emulator Discussion and Support › Hardware v
« Previous 1 ... 37 38 39 40 41 ... 189 Next »

Looking for 1080p/60fps build for Fedora x64
View New Posts | View Today's Posts

Pages (2): « Previous 1 2
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thread Modes
Looking for 1080p/60fps build for Fedora x64
03-24-2017, 03:09 AM (This post was last modified: 03-24-2017, 03:11 AM by mothergooose729.)
#11
mothergooose729 Offline
Junior Member
**
Posts: 15
Threads: 6
Joined: Mar 2017
I only want to jump in to hardily recommend nvidia for linux. The proprietary driver installation is a pain, but once in place it is a great deal more stable, feature rich, and higher performing than AMD with OpenGL. I know you are putting your eggs in that vulkan basket so this advice might not be well received... after years of hacking away with AMD in linux myself, I have now sworn off the red team for good (at least for linux). Just wanted to share my experience.

As far as the rest of your build, if you are most interested in emulation, then I would recommend getting an i3 kaby lake processor and a good after market cooler. Even with a locked multiplier, and even on a cheap motherboard, you can achieve very respectable clock speeds by increasing the system bus speed. 4.5ghz stable should be quite achievable. Most emulation is single threaded or dual threaded, so with two physical cores and two virtual cores you won't be missing out on anything compared to the more expensive and power hungry i5s (I think PCSX2 officially supports up to four threads, but stability can be suspect and performance doesn't always scale).

As to i3 vs pentium, generally you see higher IPC with i3 processors because of the increased CPU cache and support for newer and more advanced instructions, in particular AVX and virtualization support. Seeing as how most emulators are quite CPU bound, I would recommend spending a bit more to get a bit more in this case. If you can afford it on top of that, a nice 3000mhz DDR 4 dual channel memory kit will cost you about 25% more than a cheap 2133mhz kit, but will help out a lot with some of the worst case scenarios where the emulator has to retrieve something directly cached in main memory.

Linux usually feels pretty snappy on a regular HDD if you have to choose between having storage only or a small SSD. A cheap 256gb SSD will only out you about 60 or 70 dollars USD, and then you can pick up a 1tb HDD for another 60-80 at some point down the line.

If you add in a cheap case, a half decent power supply, and 100-150$ for a decent GPU, I would say a realistic budget is about 650$. With those specs, 1080p in dolphin would be easy, as would achieving play ability in any of the more demanding emulators.
Find
Reply
03-24-2017, 04:17 AM
#12
Thad Offline
Junior Member
**
Posts: 9
Threads: 2
Joined: Mar 2017
(03-24-2017, 03:09 AM)mothergooose729 Wrote: I only want to jump in to hardily recommend nvidia for linux. The proprietary driver installation is a pain, but once in place it is a great deal more stable, feature rich, and higher performing than AMD with OpenGL. I know you are putting your eggs in that vulkan basket so this advice might not be well received... after years of hacking away with AMD in linux myself, I have now sworn off the red team for good (at least for linux). Just wanted to share my experience.

Hey, I came here asking for advice and I greatly appreciate it.  You guys are warning me that I may be on the verge of making a mistake that costs me hundreds of dollars and dozens of hours of frustration; I'm grateful for that warning.

I'm still leaning AMD (which says a lot more about me than about the quality of your advice), but I'm certainly going to consider everything you guys have said (and my own negative experience with ATI cards under Linux, years ago) before I pull out my wallet.

Quote:As far as the rest of your build, if you are most interested in emulation, then I would recommend getting an i3 kaby lake processor and a good after market cooler.

I've been using a Cooler Master Hyper 212 EVO on my main machine and have been pleased with it.  Is that a good choice, or would you recommend something else?

Quote:Even with a locked multiplier, and even on a cheap motherboard, you can achieve very respectable clock speeds by increasing the system bus speed. 4.5ghz stable should be quite achievable. Most emulation is single threaded or dual threaded, so with two physical cores and two virtual cores you won't be missing out on anything compared to the more expensive and power hungry i5s (I think PCSX2 officially supports up to four threads, but stability can be suspect and performance doesn't always scale).

Good to know.  I haven't done any overclocking in ages; is there anything in particular I should look for in a motherboard so I can do this?

Nothing to add to your last few paragraphs except thanks for the help; I'll keep all that stuff in mind.  It'll probably be awhile before I can buy anyway, but this gives me plenty to consider before I make a final decision.
Find
Reply
03-24-2017, 05:22 AM
#13
KHg8m3r Offline
Doesn't sleep, just Dolphin and Robots
*******
Posts: 5,953
Threads: 4
Joined: Sep 2013
CM Hyper 212 EVO is still a good choice

Honestly, if you want to do overclocking, get a Z-series board with the i3-7350K. Overclocking on non Z-series boards and non -K series chips is not officially supported and can lead to issues. A lot of people don't have any issues with it, but I personally wouldn't risk it.
Find
Reply
03-24-2017, 06:40 AM (This post was last modified: 03-24-2017, 06:41 AM by mothergooose729.)
#14
mothergooose729 Offline
Junior Member
**
Posts: 15
Threads: 6
Joined: Mar 2017
(03-24-2017, 05:22 AM)KHg8m3r Wrote: CM Hyper 212 EVO is still a good choice

Honestly, if you want to do overclocking, get a Z-series board with the i3-7350K. Overclocking on non Z-series boards and non -K series chips is not officially supported and can lead to issues. A lot of people don't have any issues with it, but I personally wouldn't risk it.

This is true, and always recommended. The issue is cost. An 13 7350k runs about 180$. A decent z series board will run you around 150$. 

Compared to the cheaper locked multiplier i3 and a H series board, which cost about 120 and 60$ respectively. If you get this setup you might get lucky and manage a decent overclock, or you might end up running at stock speed, which is still pretty fast at 3.9ghz. 

The Hyper 212 is a solid cooler. Mounting holes haven't changed, as afar as I know, sense socket 1155 days. Depending on what you have now, you might need to track down a bracket for the board but you'll probably be fine.. 
Find
Reply
04-07-2017, 02:15 PM (This post was last modified: 04-07-2017, 03:15 PM by Thad.)
#15
Thad Offline
Junior Member
**
Posts: 9
Threads: 2
Joined: Mar 2017
Any thoughts on this build? It's a little more money than I intended to spend, but I just got a raise and I may as well celebrate.

Anything here that you guys would recommend against, or that looks like overkill for my purposes, or anywhere where I might want to downgrade one component to upgrade another?

Thanks again for all your help so far.

ETA: Crap, that graphic's card's out of stock at jet.com and I don't really want to pay another $50 for it somewhere else. What about getting the 4GB version of the same card (MSI Armor RX 480)?
Find
Reply
04-07-2017, 03:58 PM
#16
KHg8m3r Offline
Doesn't sleep, just Dolphin and Robots
*******
Posts: 5,953
Threads: 4
Joined: Sep 2013
Personally, I'd still recommend you go with an Nvidia card. This Nvidia GTX 1060 6GB is priced very closely to the RX 480 you had, while giving the better OpenGL support that you'll be needing at this time since Vulkan is still a new thing.
https://pcpartpicker.com/product/wz648d/gigabyte-geforce-gtx-1060-6gb-d5-6g-video-card-gv-n1060d5-6gd
Find
Reply
04-08-2017, 04:21 AM
#17
Thad Offline
Junior Member
**
Posts: 9
Threads: 2
Joined: Mar 2017
Fair enough; I'll give it some thought.

Another option: I've got an old 560 sitting in my current HTPC; how well do you think I'd fare if I used that for now and decided on a new card later?
Find
Reply
04-08-2017, 04:24 AM
#18
Helios Offline
Stellaaaaaaa
**********
Developers (Some Administrators and Super Moderators)
Posts: 4,395
Threads: 15
Joined: May 2012
560 should be more than enough for HD resolutions in Dolphin.
Find
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
Pages (2): « Previous 1 2


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread
Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB | Theme by Fragma

Linear Mode
Threaded Mode