Ivy Bridge Benchmarks

[Garteal]

Quote: 4.8ghz with 1.5v, ON AIR

That's a pretty high voltage IMO. I had my CPU stable-ish at 5GHz with 1.42v (still need to test it further though).
What are your temperatures at load?

Thanks for the benchmarks MaJoR.
I'll be comparing with those OC'd results later.

@bret
No, technically the Ivy Bridge should be slightly faster than a Sandy Bridge in every scenario.

[NaturalViolence]

1.5v on a 22nm cpu, oh god I'm surprised you he didn't immediately fry the chip.

[werewolfyman]

(05-14-2012, 08:29 AM)NaturalViolence Wrote: 1.5v on a 22nm cpu, oh god I'm surprised you he didn't immediately fry the chip.

My Dad's 2500k workstation Auto Overclocked to 4.5 ghz @ 1.450 volts.
We shortly set it to 4.0 ghz and 1.295 volts.
And that's a 32nm.

[dannzen]

(05-14-2012, 09:33 AM)werewolfyman Wrote:

(05-14-2012, 08:29 AM)NaturalViolence Wrote: 1.5v on a 22nm cpu, oh god I'm surprised you he didn't immediately fry the chip.

My Dad's 2500k workstation Auto Overclocked to 4.5 ghz @ 1.450 volts.
We shortly set it to 4.0 ghz and 1.295 volts.
And that's a 32nm.

the max voltage decreases... with the cpu size

0,8 µm
first pentiums needed nearly 5 volts to run...

180 nm
pentium 3 could endure 2 volts

130 nm
first pentium 4 had an default vcore of 1.75 volts...

22nm undervolted ivybridge


22nm overclocked ivybridge

[ExtremeDude2]

Already known, but:

http://www.maximumpc.com/article/news/proof_%E2%80%93_switch_fluxless_solder_thermal_paste_cause_poor_ivy_bridge_overclocking_temperatures

[dannzen]

(05-14-2012, 11:46 AM)ExtremeDude2 Wrote: Already known, but:

http://www.maximumpc.com/article/news/proof_%E2%80%93_switch_fluxless_solder_thermal_paste_cause_poor_ivy_bridge_overclocking_temperatures

your link is broken...
wtf mine too
test

Quote:The report concludes that Intel’s decision to move away from the fluxless solder used in Sandy Bridge has unfortunately crippled the overclocking potential of this generation of CPU’s.

wait the extreme editions for 999bucks got fluxless solder?


but still improved the performance by nearly 20% and cutted the prices...
on the low end marked amd is still present and giving intel a hard time

[ExtremeDude2]

(05-14-2012, 11:52 AM)dannzen Wrote:

(05-14-2012, 11:46 AM)ExtremeDude2 Wrote: Already known, but:

http://www.maximumpc.com/article/news/proof_%E2%80%93_switch_fluxless_solder_thermal_paste_cause_poor_ivy_bridge_overclocking_temperatures

your link is broken...

Yeah they do that sometimes