How much slower is the i7-3770K than the i7-4790K?
|
How much slower is the i7-3770K than the i7-4790K?
|
So I managed to find a used i7-3770K for $50 online (I have an unused B75 board lying in my room that I thought I'd put to good use), and I was just wondering if it is much slower than the 4790K? Or is the difference negligible? I should also mention that I don't plan on overclocking any time soon (I'm a power consumption freak, and the B75 board wouldn't allow for OC anyway.) Thanks in advance for your input!
[CPU - AMD Athlon X4 750K] [GPU - AMD Radeon HD 7770] [RAM - 8GB @ 1866MHz]
09-26-2014, 05:19 AM
Haswell architecture has been known to be 30% faster in dolphin than ivy bridge i.e. the 3770k so the 4790k would be possibly about 40% faster in dolphin than the 3770k as standard.
4790k has better performance per core plus a higher stock clock speed. 4790k is also known to be better at overclocking.
Laptop: Intel i7 4900mq, 8GB ram, GTX 760M, Windows 8.1 64-bit
09-26-2014, 06:05 AM
It really doesn't matter as you would be able to play most games at max speed anyway.
09-26-2014, 06:12 AM
According to this and as long as both cpus are at stock speeds: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AunYlOAfGABxdFQ0UzJyTFAxbzZhYWtGcGwySlRFa1E#gid=1
A 3770k has a value of 11,5 minutes while a 4790k has a value of 7 minutes in the dolphin benchmark. The difference is 64% at stock clocks. 09-26-2014, 10:21 AM
@Link_to_the_past
You should probably reread that doc. You're comparing a 4790K OCed to 4.4GHz against a stock 3770K. Haswell is about 30% faster than ivy bridge at any clock rate. A number as high as 64% should be a dead give away that your comparison is flawed.
"Normally if given a choice between doing something and nothing, I’d choose to do nothing. But I would do something if it helps someone else do nothing. I’d work all night if it meant nothing got done."
-Ron Swanson "I shall be a good politician, even if it kills me. Or if it kills anyone else for that matter. " -Mark Antony 09-26-2014, 12:09 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-26-2014, 12:19 PM by Link_to_the_past.)
(09-26-2014, 10:21 AM)NaturalViolence Wrote: @Link_to_the_past Both cpus use their max turbo boost speeds in the doc. That's why i suppose they are stock. 4790K is exactly the same with i7-4770k at 4.3 ghz in the doc btw (turbo boost of 4790K with two cores). Also the difference of Time * MHz (basically IPC) is higher than 30% between the two cpus, about 40%. 09-26-2014, 03:13 PM
Intel says max stock turbo for the 4690K is 3.9GHz, not 4.4: http://ark.intel.com/products/80811/Intel-Core-i5-4690K-Processor-6M-Cache-up-to-3_90-GHz
"Normally if given a choice between doing something and nothing, I’d choose to do nothing. But I would do something if it helps someone else do nothing. I’d work all night if it meant nothing got done."
-Ron Swanson "I shall be a good politician, even if it kills me. Or if it kills anyone else for that matter. " -Mark Antony 09-26-2014, 03:41 PM
(09-26-2014, 03:13 PM)NaturalViolence Wrote: Intel says max stock turbo for the 4690K is 3.9GHz, not 4.4: http://ark.intel.com/products/80811/Intel-Core-i5-4690K-Processor-6M-Cache-up-to-3_90-GHz 4790k.... 09-26-2014, 09:27 PM
because no-one linked it, one link to the intel ark page stating the 4790K's turbo is 4.4 GHz: http://ark.intel.com/products/80807/Intel-Core-i7-4790K-Processor-8M-Cache-up-to-4_40-GHz
OS: Windows 10 64 bit Professional
CPU: AMD Ryzen 5900X RAM: 16GB GPU: Radeon Vega 56 09-27-2014, 02:43 AM
(This post was last modified: 09-27-2014, 02:43 AM by NaturalViolence.)
DatKid20 Wrote:4790k.... My bad. I was looking at the wrong model this whole time.
"Normally if given a choice between doing something and nothing, I’d choose to do nothing. But I would do something if it helps someone else do nothing. I’d work all night if it meant nothing got done."
-Ron Swanson "I shall be a good politician, even if it kills me. Or if it kills anyone else for that matter. " -Mark Antony |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
