You're missing the point anyway - imitating vanilla, and only fixing things that could be described as broken, rather than replacing things just for prettiness can be done at 4K@60 with cheaper hardware than you suggested, and so isn't really a good metric for the power of that GPU. Playing it in the way it (in my opinion) 'should' be played can't really be done at 1080@60 on that GPU, though, let alone 4k, so it's also a bad thing to mention for that reason.
On an unrelated topic, is there any reason why it'd be a bad idea for my 12-year-old brother to order this tomorrow to replace his 2.2 GHz Pentium E2200 (and associated Dell stuff in the same box)?
http://www.scan.co.uk/savedbasket/4bf690...d628e1d91b
No GPU just yet, as the 960's supposed to be a similar price in the UK to what the 750 Ti's currently at.
On an unrelated topic, is there any reason why it'd be a bad idea for my 12-year-old brother to order this tomorrow to replace his 2.2 GHz Pentium E2200 (and associated Dell stuff in the same box)?
http://www.scan.co.uk/savedbasket/4bf690...d628e1d91b
No GPU just yet, as the 960's supposed to be a similar price in the UK to what the 750 Ti's currently at.
OS: Windows 10 64 bit Professional
CPU: AMD Ryzen 5900X
RAM: 48GB
GPU: Radeon 7800 XT
CPU: AMD Ryzen 5900X
RAM: 48GB
GPU: Radeon 7800 XT