Fix for Hyrule Field Twilight Princess GameCube
|
Does anyone know why the version of the 5.01589 emulator no longer works? I updated through O.T.A. my oneplus 5t of 8 gb of ram, and since then that version of dolphin no longer works, it opens, it shows me the games but it does not open any, it remains hung or in black screen. I'm using the latest versions now, but it's a shame because I think 1589 was the best ...
05-08-2018, 06:52 AM
(05-08-2018, 06:50 AM)pintitas Wrote: Does anyone know why the version of the 5.01589 emulator no longer works? I updated through O.T.A. my oneplus 5t of 8 gb of ram, and since then that version of dolphin no longer works, it opens, it shows me the isos but it does not open any, it remains hung or in black screen. I'm using the latest versions now, but it's a shame because I think 1589 was the best ... Yes, android 8.1 laid out the process memory slightly differently, causing a crash that was fixed in 5.0-6023, so anything after that should be fine. 05-08-2018, 07:51 AM
05-08-2018, 08:20 AM
(05-08-2018, 07:51 AM)pintitas Wrote: A thousand thanks, and what version is good or do you recommend me from 5.0-6023? Without the specific device & driver combination to test on, I can't recommend anything but "the latest", as most of the "recommended" versions are ones that happen to avoid specific driver bugs, and that can be very dependent on such things. 05-08-2018, 05:16 PM
(05-07-2018, 08:14 PM)mstreurman Wrote: And then we have to keep in mind that emulation is way more depending on Single core CPU power than it is on GPU and that is still long ways of being powerful enough, even a Intel Celeron outperforms these chips by almost 2.75 times and these Celeron's are already WAY too slow to run any game reliably.(e.g. the fastest Single core speed a Snapdragon 845 (Samsung Galaxy S9+) has[color=#333333] in Geekbench 4.2 x64[/color] is about 2000[color=#333333], the fastest Single core speed of the Celeron G3900 (not overclocked)[color=#333333][color=#333333] in Geekbe[/color][/color][color=#333333][color=#333333]nch 4.2 x64[/color][/color] is 5499.)[/color] You are misreading those numbers. The celeron G3900 is around 3300. Popular CPUs like the i5 3570 are around 3,000 and the snapdragon 845 is around 2400. The main thing is lack of GPU support and no developer interest, not really the CPU. (05-08-2018, 05:16 PM)Grey1213 Wrote: You are misreading those numbers. The celeron G3900 is around 3300. Popular CPUs like the i5 3570 are around 3,000 and the snapdragon 845 is around 2400. The main thing is lack of GPU support and no developer interest, not really the CPU. Remember that geekbench doesn't test *exactly* the same things as the dolphin JIT generates (which is why I dislike pc "enthusiasts" bandying around "IPC" as a single magic number to compare - IPC doing *what* is important - there can be big changes in relative performance doing different things and running different instruction streams. To be honest, the entire goal of using a single number to compare will always be nonsense, as different designs will be better/worse at different things). And the dolphin JIT happens to like really wide frontends and reorder buffers, which means that the big x86_64 CPU designs (like and post-p4 Intel and AMD's ryzen) tend to overperform what you'd expect from just comparing the geekbench scores (compared to most arm designs at least) 05-09-2018, 03:24 AM
(05-09-2018, 02:51 AM)JonnyH Wrote: Remember that geekbench doesn't test *exactly* the same things as the dolphin JIT generates (which is why I dislike pc "enthusiasts" bandying around "IPC" as a single magic number to compare - IPC doing *what* is important - there can be big changes in relative performance doing different things and running different instruction streams. To be honest, the entire goal of using a single number to compare will always be nonsense, as different designs will be better/worse at different things). Would that mean that Samsung’s M3 core is a significant improvement above and beyond what the numbers suggest? Anandtech’s analysis revealed it to be an extremely wide design, very Apple-esque custom cores. Obviously it’s more complicated in real world, but anandtech’s further testing revealed that the chip itself is speedy when the DVFS is fixed. 05-09-2018, 03:40 AM
(05-09-2018, 03:24 AM)Nintonito Wrote: Would that mean that Samsung’s M3 core is a significant improvement above and beyond what the numbers suggest? Anandtech’s analysis revealed it to be an extremely wide design, very Apple-esque custom cores. Obviously it’s more complicated in real world, but anandtech’s further testing revealed that the chip itself is speedy when the DVFS is fixed. Maybe? Until you test it you don't really *know* - it may be limited by something else, or something about the workload/core means it can't take advantage of the wide decode particularly well. 05-09-2018, 05:30 AM
good, but the forecast is encouraging, sure that in three years or less smartphones will emulate without problems the PlayStation 3, because without much development of Dolphin for Android today most of the high-end emulates quite well the consoles of 128 bits ...
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)