Dolphin CPU hierarchy [UNOFFICIAL]

Nintendo Maniac 64 · (This post was last modified: 11-03-2012, 09:38 AM by Nintendo Maniac 64.)

But you already have listed the E2 series under desktops... Also the E1 isn't under netbooks/nettops at all.

**NaturalViolence** · 11-03-2012, 09:44 AM **#192**

Quote:Also the E1 isn't under netbooks/nettops at all.

Yes it is:

Quote:Netbooks and Nettops
Performance categorized by box names:

Category 6: Slow
Even with heavy overclocking these cpus are simply too slow for most games.
-Intel Atom
-AMD E series
-AMD C series
-AMD Turion II Neo
-AMD Athlon II Neo
-AMD Turion Neo X2
-AMD Athlon Neo X2
-AMD Athlon Neo
-Any VIA cpu

Quote:But you already have listed the E2 series under desktops...

I did list the E2 series under the desktop section since there are some llano cpus under that name. So that could technically cover the E2-1800 as well.

Let's look at how we got here shall we?

Quote:EDIT: Oh, um, I just realized; you're missing the "E1 series" in the desktop section - you have the "E2 series" however. You can look at their differences here:

Can we at least agree that this is wrong and that I should not list E1 under the desktop section?

Nintendo Maniac 64 · (This post was last modified: 11-03-2012, 09:49 AM by Nintendo Maniac 64.)

(11-03-2012, 09:44 AM)NaturalViolence Wrote: Can we at least agree that this is wrong and that I should not list E1 under the desktop section?

I thought we already agreed? That was my previously-mentioned "half wrong".

And I was taking "E series" to mean 40nm Brazos like the E-350 and the E-450, not the newer 32nm E1-1200.

**NaturalViolence** · (This post was last modified: 11-03-2012, 09:57 AM by NaturalViolence.)

Like my new streamlined peer review system neobrain? Tongue

Quote:And I was taking "E series" to mean 40nm Brazos like the E-350 and the E-450, not the newer 32nm E1-1200.

I can see how that might be confusing.

Updated Netbook/nettop section to avoid confusion.

grogel · (This post was last modified: 11-14-2012, 09:14 AM by grogel.)

I would like to throw my specs out there and offer my benchmarking services to anyone interested.

i5 3570k @ 4.8Ghz WC (supports AVX instruction set), 6 hour prime stable, 4 cpu 99 stock battle stable
2 gtx 680s sli
1600MHz 11-11-11-28 Samsung Wonder RAM @ 16GB
Vertex 4 OCZ SSD (The emulator is being played from the SSD in hopes of gaining some performance)
windows 7 x64
Primary Monitor 2560x1440 Shimian
Secondary Monitor 1366x768 Samsung

**ExtremeDude2** · (This post was last modified: 11-14-2012, 09:17 AM by ExtremeDude2.)

I'm only accustom to SSAA in dolphin, but imma guess your pushing your GPU (notice the lack of an "s" :p) too hard with 3x IR and 16xQ CSAA

**NaturalViolence** · 11-15-2012, 12:19 PM **#197**

......what are you talking about? Who are you talking to?

grogel · 11-15-2012, 04:39 PM **#198**

(11-15-2012, 12:19 PM)NaturalViolence Wrote: ......what are you talking about? Who are you talking to?

He commented before I edited my post out of here and onto a new topic. Sorry about that!

**admin89** · (This post was last modified: 11-21-2012, 10:19 AM by admin89.)

@NaturalViolence i think you should make 2 groups like this : A6 , A8 , A10 (LLano) and A6 . A8 , A10 (Trinity)
Both Trinity desktop CPU and mobile CPU should blow away Core 2 duo , Core 2 Quad

**NaturalViolence** · (This post was last modified: 11-21-2012, 02:31 PM by NaturalViolence.)

Quote:@NaturalViolence i think you should make 2 groups like this : A6 , A8 , A10 (LLano) and A6 . A8 , A10 (Trinity)
Both Trinity desktop CPU and mobile CPU should blow away Core 2 duo , Core 2 Quad

Considering that most core 2 duo mobiles beat llano by a pretty significant margin in single threaded tests and trinity is only slightly faster than llano I doubt that.