• Login
  • Register
  • Dolphin Forums
  • Home
  • FAQ
  • Download
  • Wiki
  • Code


Dolphin, the GameCube and Wii emulator - Forums › Dolphin Emulator Discussion and Support › Hardware v
« Previous 1 ... 55 56 57 58 59 ... 189 Next »

Dolphin CPU hierarchy [UNOFFICIAL]
View New Posts | View Today's Posts

Pages (51): « Previous 1 ... 15 16 17 18 19 ... 51 Next »
Jump to page 
Thread Rating:
  • 4 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thread Modes
Dolphin CPU hierarchy [UNOFFICIAL]
11-03-2012, 06:34 AM (This post was last modified: 11-03-2012, 06:39 AM by Nintendo Maniac 64.)
#161
Nintendo Maniac 64 Offline
Posting Freak
*****
Posts: 846
Threads: 30
Joined: Jan 2011
Either way, the mention of the Pentium 4 vs the Athlon 64 x2 was that the first post of this topic has them in the same tier and yet even your "quick reference guide" has them in two separate tiers. If you were following my earlier posts in this thread you would know that I felt those two should indeed be in separate tiers.

(11-03-2012, 06:17 AM)Gabriel Belmont Wrote: I'd say that a good Phenom II processor still beats the newer ones that AMD have on the market today at least when it comes to games and emulation.

For games Vishera beats a Phenom. As for Dolphin performance, we don't really know seeing how nobody has really benchmarked any processor with Piledriver cores in Dolphin.
Dolphin 5.0 CPU benchmark

CPU: Pentium G3258 @ 4.5GHz 1.24v
GPU: Intel integrated
RAM: 4x4GB Corsair Vengence @ DDR3-1600
OS: Linux Mint of some variety + [VM] Win7 SP1 x64 
Find
Reply
11-03-2012, 06:41 AM
#162
Starscream Away
Above and Beyond
*******
Posts: 4,052
Threads: 213
Joined: Jun 2009
It's definitely not easy to get everyone to agree on these things. Look at NV's list, his CPU list is much longer than mine and people are still not going to be able to agree where to rank them. Some people are certainly not going to agree with me when I try to break down the CPU list to 4. There's always going to be the "why did you list that one?" or "why didn't you list this one?". It is what it is.
Asus Laptop: K53TA
OS: Windows 7 Home Premium, 64-Bit - SP1
CPU: AMD Llano A6-3400M, Quad-Core, 1.4GHz-2.6GHz (Overclocked)
GPU: AMD Radeon HD6650M, 1GB GDDR3 (Catalyst 13.1)
RAM: Samsung 4GB DDR3-1333










Find
Reply
11-03-2012, 06:49 AM
#163
Duke Nukem Offline
Banned
Posts: 1,724
Threads: 48
Joined: Mar 2011
(11-03-2012, 06:34 AM)Nintendo Maniac 64 Wrote: For games Vishera beats a Phenom. As for Dolphin performance, we don't really know seeing how nobody has really benchmarked any processor with Piledriver cores in Dolphin.

I know that Bulldozer aka Faildozer is worse then a Phenom II when it comes to emulation & gaming.

The 2nd generation might be better, who knows.
Find
Reply
11-03-2012, 06:53 AM
#164
Nintendo Maniac 64 Offline
Posting Freak
*****
Posts: 846
Threads: 30
Joined: Jan 2011
(11-03-2012, 06:49 AM)Gabriel Belmont Wrote: The 2nd generation might be better, who knows.

Err... MIGHT? It's been out for 2 weeks now.

Oh, and look at this:
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/medal-of-honor-warfighter-performance-benchmark,3336-7.html

WAT.
Dolphin 5.0 CPU benchmark

CPU: Pentium G3258 @ 4.5GHz 1.24v
GPU: Intel integrated
RAM: 4x4GB Corsair Vengence @ DDR3-1600
OS: Linux Mint of some variety + [VM] Win7 SP1 x64 
Find
Reply
11-03-2012, 07:01 AM
#165
Duke Nukem Offline
Banned
Posts: 1,724
Threads: 48
Joined: Mar 2011
It doesn't matter if it has been out for two weeks, I haven't even heard of Piledriver before I came to this thread so you have to excuse me for the lack of knowledge.
Find
Reply
11-03-2012, 07:04 AM
#166
NaturalViolence Offline
It's not that I hate people, I just hate stupid people
*******
Posts: 9,013
Threads: 24
Joined: Oct 2009
Quote:or a Radeon 6850 when Graphics Core Next is out?

That part you might want to reconsider. It seems the HD 6000 series actually have less issues with dolphin for some reason.

Quote:So the idea is that Piledriver is close to Phenom II performance?

Piledriver is close to phenom II in IPC (performance per clock). The performance of course depends on clock rates, but it does clock higher. Most piledriver based cpus perform above most phenom II cpus.

Quote:I'd say that a good Phenom II processor still beats the newer ones that AMD have on the market today at least when it comes to games and emulation.

It depends on the game, in some cases you're right.

Quote:Either way, the mention of the Pentium 4 vs the Athlon 64 x2 was that the first post of this topic has them in the same tier and yet even your "quick reference guide" has them in two separate tiers. If you were following my earlier posts in this thread you would know that I felt those two should indeed be in separate tiers.

We've talked about this already. I thought I explained my point of view quite thoroughly:
(10-12-2012, 01:00 PM)NaturalViolence Wrote:
Nintendo Maniac 64 Wrote:My main beef is having something like an Athlon 64 x2 in the same category as a Pentium 4.

I mentioned my reasoning for this a couple of times:
NaturalViolence Wrote:They're both too slow for most games. Therefore they both belong in the slow category.

How would I describe a user experience above
NaturalViolence Wrote:Even with heavy overclocking these cpus are simply too slow for most games.
But below:
NaturalViolence Wrote:These cpus run most games at fullspeed with HLE audio if they are heavily overclocked. But at stock speeds they may have have trouble.




There is a grey area inbetween the two, sure, but I can't draw a line in the sand anywhere in the middle so I really have no way to further separate them into User experience tiers.


Quote:The 2nd generation might be better, who knows.

Who knows? You do realize that we've benchmarked both of them right?
"Normally if given a choice between doing something and nothing, I’d choose to do nothing. But I would do something if it helps someone else do nothing. I’d work all night if it meant nothing got done."  
-Ron Swanson

"I shall be a good politician, even if it kills me. Or if it kills anyone else for that matter. "
-Mark Antony
Website Find
Reply
11-03-2012, 07:09 AM
#167
Duke Nukem Offline
Banned
Posts: 1,724
Threads: 48
Joined: Mar 2011
(11-03-2012, 07:04 AM)NaturalViolence Wrote: Who knows? You do realize that we've benchmarked both of them right?

Actually not, I have been away for quite some time and haven't had a chance going through everything yet.
Find
Reply
11-03-2012, 07:16 AM
#168
NaturalViolence Offline
It's not that I hate people, I just hate stupid people
*******
Posts: 9,013
Threads: 24
Joined: Oct 2009
Well then you've got some catching up to do. They came out a few weeks ago.
"Normally if given a choice between doing something and nothing, I’d choose to do nothing. But I would do something if it helps someone else do nothing. I’d work all night if it meant nothing got done."  
-Ron Swanson

"I shall be a good politician, even if it kills me. Or if it kills anyone else for that matter. "
-Mark Antony
Website Find
Reply
11-03-2012, 07:21 AM (This post was last modified: 11-03-2012, 07:22 AM by Nintendo Maniac 64.)
#169
Nintendo Maniac 64 Offline
Posting Freak
*****
Posts: 846
Threads: 30
Joined: Jan 2011
Technically Piledriver has been out since summer in the form of the Trinity APU. Piledriver by definition is the architecture used in the CPU cores, not the overall processor design. It's Vishera that came out just two weeks ago.
Dolphin 5.0 CPU benchmark

CPU: Pentium G3258 @ 4.5GHz 1.24v
GPU: Intel integrated
RAM: 4x4GB Corsair Vengence @ DDR3-1600
OS: Linux Mint of some variety + [VM] Win7 SP1 x64 
Find
Reply
11-03-2012, 07:22 AM
#170
Duke Nukem Offline
Banned
Posts: 1,724
Threads: 48
Joined: Mar 2011
Yeah I actually have some catching up to do. Feels like I have been in a coma or something.
Find
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
Pages (51): « Previous 1 ... 15 16 17 18 19 ... 51 Next »
Jump to page 


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread
Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB | Theme by Fragma

Linear Mode
Threaded Mode