• Login
  • Register
  • Dolphin Forums
  • Home
  • FAQ
  • Download
  • Wiki
  • Code


Dolphin, the GameCube and Wii emulator - Forums › Dolphin Emulator Discussion and Support › General Discussion v
« Previous 1 ... 281 282 283 284 285 ... 368 Next »

Does Dolphin benefit from bigger L2 or L3 cache size
View New Posts | View Today's Posts

Pages (3): « Previous 1 2 3 Next »
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thread Modes
Does Dolphin benefit from bigger L2 or L3 cache size
10-29-2010, 05:50 AM
#11
metalnumb Offline
Member
***
Posts: 149
Threads: 23
Joined: Sep 2009
what do you mean by pipe performance ?!
My PC
AMD Athlon II X2 250
Kingstone 2x2GB DDR3 @1333Mhz
6850HD 1GB GDDR5





Find
Reply
10-29-2010, 05:55 AM (This post was last modified: 10-29-2010, 05:59 AM by Squall Leonhart.)
#12
Squall Leonhart Offline
Friend of local jackass
*******
Posts: 1,177
Threads: 27
Joined: Apr 2009
instruction pipelines are utilised to reduce the amount of cycles required to perform an instruction, AMD's SSE2 and 3 support in some cases take more cycles to complete than a similar clocked Intel processor of the same generation due to having longer pipes or shorter depth.

more cache however does reduce the chance of a stall in the execution pipeline.
[Image: squall_sig2.gif]
[Image: squall4rinoa.png]
VBA-M
Website Find
Reply
10-29-2010, 05:57 AM
#13
metalnumb Offline
Member
***
Posts: 149
Threads: 23
Joined: Sep 2009
aha , i understand now why intel performs better than AMD per clock , apart from better architechture for CPU circuits Tongue !
learned something new !! thanks alot !!
My PC
AMD Athlon II X2 250
Kingstone 2x2GB DDR3 @1333Mhz
6850HD 1GB GDDR5





Find
Reply
10-29-2010, 06:00 AM
#14
Squall Leonhart Offline
Friend of local jackass
*******
Posts: 1,177
Threads: 27
Joined: Apr 2009
Take a look at this article

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/athlon-l3-cache,2416.html
[Image: squall_sig2.gif]
[Image: squall4rinoa.png]
VBA-M
Website Find
Reply
10-30-2010, 12:25 AM
#15
hungry man Offline
Member
***
Posts: 140
Threads: 13
Joined: Oct 2010
L3 is slower (slightly) than L2 because of access time. You're better off in EVERY case having more L2 than L3. And as for "Raw processing power" that's literally based on your Lcache speed (your ghz :: cache relationship) so of course it makes a difference. In fact it probably makes the biggest difference.
Laptop:
i5 520m :: 4GB RAM :: ATI 5650 (700, 900)
Find
Reply
10-30-2010, 01:21 AM
#16
Squall Leonhart Offline
Friend of local jackass
*******
Posts: 1,177
Threads: 27
Joined: Apr 2009
Access times aren't the biggest of problems. by reducing the chance of execution stalls in the pipeline by reducing the chance of cache miss you can improve performance by not having the cpu performing short cycles.
[Image: squall_sig2.gif]
[Image: squall4rinoa.png]
VBA-M
Website Find
Reply
10-30-2010, 01:32 AM
#17
metalnumb Offline
Member
***
Posts: 149
Threads: 23
Joined: Sep 2009
(10-29-2010, 05:48 AM)Squall Leonhart Wrote: AMD chips are limited in instruction pipe performance for the most part

Now the last question will remain !!
- for someone with an AMD platform and using his PC for dolphin ... will he make use of extra cache L2 or L3 ?

what about north-bridge freq. <Hyper-transport> does it make any difference ??


My PC
AMD Athlon II X2 250
Kingstone 2x2GB DDR3 @1333Mhz
6850HD 1GB GDDR5





Find
Reply
10-30-2010, 01:42 AM
#18
Squall Leonhart Offline
Friend of local jackass
*******
Posts: 1,177
Threads: 27
Joined: Apr 2009
hyper transport is the replacement for the FSB on amd chips. it mostly only matters when overclocking or using otherwise usually unsupported memory speeds.
[Image: squall_sig2.gif]
[Image: squall4rinoa.png]
VBA-M
Website Find
Reply
10-30-2010, 01:48 AM
#19
metalnumb Offline
Member
***
Posts: 149
Threads: 23
Joined: Sep 2009
(10-30-2010, 01:42 AM)Squall Leonhart Wrote: hyper transport is the replacement for the FSB on amd chips. it mostly only matters when overclocking or using otherwise usually unsupported memory speeds.

what about cache ?
is it useful to increase cache while using an AMD platform ?
i mean for dolphin of course
My PC
AMD Athlon II X2 250
Kingstone 2x2GB DDR3 @1333Mhz
6850HD 1GB GDDR5





Find
Reply
10-30-2010, 09:11 AM
#20
NaturalViolence Offline
It's not that I hate people, I just hate stupid people
*******
Posts: 9,013
Threads: 24
Joined: Oct 2009
He already answered your question, yes. With modern AMD cpus cache size is even more important than with intel cpus.
"Normally if given a choice between doing something and nothing, I’d choose to do nothing. But I would do something if it helps someone else do nothing. I’d work all night if it meant nothing got done."  
-Ron Swanson

"I shall be a good politician, even if it kills me. Or if it kills anyone else for that matter. "
-Mark Antony
Website Find
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
Pages (3): « Previous 1 2 3 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread
Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB | Theme by Fragma

Linear Mode
Threaded Mode