curious about new SVN versions

[d8thstar]

hi all,

i just got an auto response to an issue i posted a while back, more of a feature request really, issue 2246. the message said it has been fixed.

so, i'm curious about these issue fixes, how soon do they get implemented into a new SVN build?

no rush, like i said, i'm just curious. thanks

[James333]

Really is backwards, first they commit the fix in the svn repository and then they change the issue status

[Kolano]

Really is backwards, first they commit the fix in the svn repository and then they change the issue status

I'm not sure I'd call that "backwards". If it were done the other way issues would be closed that were still unaddressed, which wouldn't be appropriate.

To the original poster, if your issue was closed it was addressed in a recent release. If you look through the change logs one should be marked as fixing your issue.

[James333]

Then I don't know how to call it

The issue is classified as fixed when in the revision description the commiter writes "Fixes issue xxxx", or when someone do it manually in the issue itself

[d8thstar]

ok, let me see if i understand this. my issue is still "open" but someone has posted that it has been"fixed".

does that mean that one of the owners needs to commit to the fix and then incorporate into an SVN build?

again, i'm just curious, can't wait to add dolphin to my arcade machine

[Billiard26]

ok, let me see if i understand this. my issue is still "open" but someone has posted that it has been"fixed".

does that mean that one of the owners needs to commit to the fix and then incorporate into an SVN build?

again, i'm just curious, can't wait to add dolphin to my arcade machine

If someone marked it "Fixed", the fix should have already been committed.

[d8thstar]

If someone marked it "Fixed", the fix should have already been committed.

i believe it was you that marked it fixed, issue 2246?

thanks billiard!