Well I'm gonna take a running jump because the benchmarks are there for everyone to look at. My personal opinion if I was going to choose between the 2 is the i7 920, if you look at that pic of the Anandtech benches it shows that the 1055T beats the i7 920 in one test, the X264 first pass. The 1055T has 2 extra cores and it still only beats it in 1 test. This shows that the i7 is a much more efficient design if it can beat an AMD cpu that has an extra 2 cores therefore each individual core has to be more powerful than the AMD so in applications that use less than the total available cores then I fail to see the point in buying a less powerful CPU. If everything in the planet used unlimited cores then I'd get the AMD since it would be cheaper than the Intel, unfortunately that is not the reality we live in. So no more posts from me in this topic, fanboys will be fanboys and I won't bother fighting them any longer.
Ragnarok: i5 750 @ 3200MHz | Titan Fenrir | MSI P55-GD65 | 8GiB Corsair 1600MHz CAS9 | 1GiB HD6950 | Crucial M4 64GB | Samsung F3 500GB | Samsung F3 1TB | Seasonic X-750 | X-Fi XtremeGamer | HAF932 | Win7 Pro | LMDE
Sleipnir: Samsung Galaxy S II (CM10.1)
Gungnir: Asus Nexus 7 (Stock)
Sleipnir: Samsung Galaxy S II (CM10.1)
Gungnir: Asus Nexus 7 (Stock)