(03-31-2012, 08:07 AM)Dodge112 Wrote: Why wouldn't it be able to play games fast enough?
Because the CPU is not fast enough.
(03-31-2012, 08:07 AM)Dodge112 Wrote: The CPU only costs me 70EU.
I know. You want to get off cheap and then still expect to play games, it doesn't work that way. If that was the CPU to have, everyone would have it and no one would be recommending anything else.
(03-31-2012, 08:07 AM)Dodge112 Wrote: You people said I would need more computing power, well now I have it right?
No, not enough.
(03-31-2012, 08:07 AM)Dodge112 Wrote: BTW @ the i5 2500k remark, that CPU mixed with A good motherboard that runs @ 4.4GHZ would require A heatsink that is 60+ USD, or A case that is 50+ish USD and atleast the evo 212, which will add up in cost. Not to mention the CPU/MOBO combo would be atleast 300USD)
It's not our problem that you can't afford what's needed to play games well. You asked if your PC can play games well, we/I said no, we then told you what would play games well. What you do from there is up to you.
So, get your Athlon II and then come back and post a thread about games running too slow, I'll be here waiting.
Asus Laptop: K53TA
OS: Windows 7 Home Premium, 64-Bit - SP1
CPU: AMD Llano A6-3400M, Quad-Core, 1.4GHz-2.6GHz (Overclocked)
GPU: AMD Radeon HD6650M, 1GB GDDR3 (Catalyst 13.1)
RAM: Samsung 4GB DDR3-1333
OS: Windows 7 Home Premium, 64-Bit - SP1
CPU: AMD Llano A6-3400M, Quad-Core, 1.4GHz-2.6GHz (Overclocked)
GPU: AMD Radeon HD6650M, 1GB GDDR3 (Catalyst 13.1)
RAM: Samsung 4GB DDR3-1333

